Abstract:Objective: The emergence of unattended automated office blood pressure (u-AOBP) measurement, facilitated by the flourishing development of electronic blood pressure monitors, has been proposed as a potential alternative or complementary approach for assessing patients’ blood pressure status within clinical settings. However, robust evidence is lacking to determine its application in diagnosing hypertension within the clinical practice in China. This study aims to compare u-AOBP values with standard office blood pressure data, assess the correlation between u-AOBP and diagnostic thresholds. Design and method: The study involved participants recruited from October 2023 to February 2024 in three hospitals: People's Hospital of Gongyi City in Henan Province, Nangong City Hospital in Hebei Province, and Fuwai Hospital of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences. Standardized validated upper arm blood pressure monitors were used to measure blood pressure. Baseline demographic data, anthropometric measurements, u-AOBP, and standard office blood pressure data were collected, along with additional examination results, including echocardiograms and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Results: 1. The difference between u-AOBP and awake dynamic average blood pressure was 1.34 mmHg (95% confidence interval: 0.88-3.55 mmHg), and the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.236). 2. The optimal cutoff values for diagnosing elevated blood pressure using u-AOBP, determined by ROC curve analysis based on awake dynamic blood pressure measurements, were 130.75/83.75 mmHg (sensitivity 89.73%, specificity 27.27%). 3. In participants with a dipper blood pressure diurnal rhythm, there was no statistically significant difference between standard office blood pressure and u-AOBP measurements (P > 0.05). However, in the group including non-dipper rhythm participants, standard office blood pressure was higher than u-AOBP by 5.84/4.98 mmHg (P < 0.05). Conclusions: 1. Unattended automated blood pressure measurements can reduce, but not eliminate, the white coat effect, with an optimal cutoff value for diagnosing elevated blood pressure determined as 130.75/83.75 mmHg. 2. In individuals with a normal dipper blood pressure diurnal rhythm, standardized u-AOBP values are equivalent to standard office blood pressure.

Comparisons of an automated oscillometric device with a hybrid manual auscultatory device for the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

A14101 Comparison of Blood Pressure Measurements —conventional Office, Automated Office, and Self-Measured Home

Validation of a wearable cuff-less wristwatch-type blood pressure monitoring device

Automated Device That Complies with Current Guidelines for Office Blood Pressure Measurement: Design and Pilot Application Study of the Microlife WatchBP Office Device.

Comparative study on daytime and nighttime blood pressure monitoring between routine ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and the combined use of the Omron HEM-6410T watch and HEM-9601T wrist devices.

Validation of the Health & Life HL868BA blood pressure monitor for home blood pressure monitoring according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol.

Validation of the ANDON KD-5915 Blood Pressure Monitor for Home Blood Pressure Monitoring According to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol

Validation of the KANG KC-2850 oscillometric upper-arm ambulatory blood pressure monitor in general population according to the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/European Society of Hypertension/International Organization for Standardization universal standard

Validation of the Andon KD-5917 automatic upper arm blood pressure monitor, for clinic use and self-measurement, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010.

Validation of the HONSUN LD-578 blood pressure monitor for home blood pressure monitoring according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol.

Comparison of blood pressure values—self-measured at home, measured at an unattended office, and measured at a conventional attended office

Validation of Omron HBP-1300 professional blood pressure monitor based on auscultation in children and adults

A convenient method to verify the accuracy of oscillometric blood pressure monitors by the auscultatory method: A smartphone-based app.

Validation of the Health & Life HL168JD wrist blood pressure monitor for home blood pressure monitoring according to the International Protocol:

Feasibility, credence, and usefulness of out-of-office cuffless blood pressure monitoring using smartwatch: a population survey

A new automatic blood pressure kit auscultates for accurate reading with a smartphone: A diagnostic accuracy study.

ACCURACY AND BLOOD PRESSURE THRESHOLD CONTROL ANALYSIS OF UNATTENDED AUTOMATED OFFICE BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY BASED ON MULTICENTER POPULATIONS

Feasibility and measurement stability of smartwatch-based cuffless blood pressure monitoring: A real-world prospective observational study

Status of home blood pressure measurement in treated hypertensive patients. Results of a survey from two cities in Korea

Intelligent Assist Office Blood Pressures (IOBP) versus awake ambulatory monitoring and conventional auscultatory office readings in Chinese primary medical institutions

Validation of the SEJOY BP-1307 Upper-Arm Blood Pressure Monitor for Home Blood Pressure Monitoring According to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol Revision 2010