Abstract:Background: An individualized approach using shared decision-making (SDM) and goal setting is a person-centred strategy that may facilitate prioritization of treatment options. SDM has not been adopted extensively in clinical practice. An interprofessional approach to SDM with tools to facilitate patient participation may overcome barriers to SDM use. The aim was to explore decision-making experiences of health professionals and people with diabetes (PwD), then develop an intervention to facilitate interprofessional shared decision-making (IP-SDM) and goal-setting. Methods: This was a multi-phased study. 1) Feasibility: Using a descriptive qualitative study, individual interviews with primary care physicians, nurses, dietitians, pharmacists, and PwD were conducted. The interviews explored their experiences with SDM and priority-setting, including facilitators and barriers, relevance of a decision aid for priority-setting, and integration of SDM and a decision aid into practice. 2) Development: An evidence-based SDM toolkit was developed, consisting of an online decision aid, MyDiabetesPlan, and implementation tools. MyDiabetesPlan was reviewed by content experts for accuracy and comprehensiveness. Usability assessment was done with 3) heuristic evaluation and 4) user testing, followed by 5) refinement. Results: Seven PwD and 10 clinicians participated in the interviews. From interviews with PwD, we identified that: (1) approaches to decision-making were diverse and dynamic; (2) a trusting relationship with the clinician and dialog were critical precursors to SDM; and, (3) goal-setting was a dynamic process. From clinicians, we found: (1) complementary (holistic and disease specific) approaches to the complex patient were used; (2) patient-provider agendas for goal-setting were often conflicting; (3) a flexible approach to decision-making was needed; and, (4) conflict could be resolved through SDM. Following usability assessment, we redesigned MyDiabetesPlan to consist of data collection and recommendation stages. Findings were used to finalize a multi-component toolkit and implementation strategy, consisting of MyDiabetesPlan, instructional card and videos, and orientation meetings with participating patients and clinicians. Conclusions: A decision aid can provide information, facilitate clinician-patient dialog and strengthen the therapeutic relationship. Implementation of the decision aid can fit into a model of team care that respects and exemplifies professional identity, and can facilitate intra-team communication. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02379078. Date of Registration: 11 February 2015.

Experiences and outcomes of patients participating in a perioperative shared decision-making pathway

1879 On a knife's edge: role of a Clinical Nurse Specialist on balancing complex treatment decisions in acute surgery

Perioperative pathways for children with neurodevelopmental conditions and behaviours that challenge: An evaluation of parent experiences for service improvement

Decision regret following surgical management of pilonidal disease

Opportunities to optimise care and choice in joint replacement surgery using a digitally delivered, holistic PreHab pathway

A formalized shared decision-making process with individualized decision aids for older patients referred for cardiac surgery

Consensus‐Building Processes for Implementing Perioperative Care Pathways in Common Elective Surgeries: A Systematic Review

Testing of a risk-stratified patient decision aid to facilitate shared decision-making for extended postoperative thromboprophylaxis after major abdominal surgery for cancer

Postoperative shared-care for patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Pathway redesign: putting patients ahead of professionals

Developing an Individualized Patient Decision Aid for Chronic Coronary Disease Based on the ISCHEMIA Trial: A Mixed-Methods Study

Development of an evidence-based clinical pathway for patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Patient experiences during the planned perioperative care pathway: An integrative review

Codesign of health technology interventions to support best-practice perioperative care and surgical waitlist management

Preoperative comprehensive geriatric assessment and multidisciplinary team input in older people undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery: A feasibility trial

Does preoperative multidisciplinary team assessment of high-risk patients improve the safety and outcomes of patients undergoing surgery?

A Safe Transitions Pathway for post-craniotomy neurological surgery patients: high-value care that bypasses the intensive care unit

O021 Preferred attributes of care pathways for obstructive sleep apnoea from the perspective of diagnosed patients and high-risk individuals: a discrete choice experiment

Beyond pros and cons - developing a patient decision aid to cultivate dialog to build relationships: insights from a qualitative study and decision aid development

Effect of a person‐centred goals‐of‐care form and clinical communication training on shared decision‐making and outcomes in an acute hospital: a prospective longitudinal interventional study

Decision Support in Cardiac Surgery: Early Exploration of Requirements with Cardiac Anesthetists and Surgeons