Abstract:12103 Background: In the last decade the therapeutic algorithms in lung cancer have changed dramatically because of the continuous approval of new drugs, leading to steadily improving survival. However, recent studies show that the growing complexity has also led to a negative impact on prognostic awareness and patient-physician communication. In a setting of mostly frail patients, this uncertainty jeopardizes goal-concordant care. Consequently, the guideline recommendations of patient-empowerment and shared decision-making are more important than ever, but evidence-based, comprehensively implemented tools are still lacking. Methods: Randomized controlled, open, mono-center trial (n=138) with two arms: A) use of a decision aid incl. clarification of personal values accompanied by a decision-coaching session vs. B) usual care; stratified block randomization according to the characteristic of preferred decision-making at baseline; primary endpoint: clarity of personal values (Value Clarity Subscale of the Decisional Conflict Scale). Secondary outcomes: patients' self-efficacy (DSES), decisional conflict (DCS), perceived preparation for and involvement in decision-making (PDMS and PICS), general health and emotional state (EQ-5D-5L and HADS). In addition to the descriptive evaluation, group comparisons between the two arms were performed (non-parametric comparison: van Elteren test). Results: The evaluation showed high values for decisional conflict in both groups (total mean score arm A 41,25 and arm B 38,65), exposing relevant conflict in 57,6% of patients, highest in the subscale for information (64,4%) and uncertainty (58,9%). PDMS showed that most patients considered the intervention helpful (“prepare for the next visit with your doctor”: 83,8%, “prepare to talk to your doctor about what matters most to you”: 81,6%, “help to know that decision depends on what matters most to you”: 81,6%). The PICS-subscale “patient information” (active information-seeking behavior) showed a statistically significant difference between the two groups (arm A: 2,86 vs arm B: 3,12; p=0,048). All other outcomes showed no significant differences with equally high DCS scores in both arms’ follow-up. Conclusions: Patients with advanced lung cancer show a strikingly high decisional conflict. Despite successfully empowering perceived preparation for decision-making and decreasing information needs in the encounter with the physician, the intervention was not strong enough to improve significantly the decisional conflict. In a setting of constantly changing oncological information and increasing prognostic uncertainty, tailored support that flexibly adapts to individual needs in decision-making is urgently needed. Clinical trial information: DRKS00028023 .

Testing of a risk-stratified patient decision aid to facilitate shared decision-making for extended postoperative thromboprophylaxis after major abdominal surgery for cancer

The evaluation of a rectal cancer decision aid and the factors influencing its implementation in clinical practice

Extended-duration thromboprophylaxis following major abdominopelvic surgery – For everyone or selected cases only?

Universal EHRs Clinical Decision Support for Thromboprophylaxis in Medical Inpatients: A Cluster Randomized Trial

A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Impact of Pre-Consultation Information on Patients’ Perception of Information Conveyed and Satisfaction with the Decision-Making Process

A Randomized, Controlled Trial Evaluating Perioperative Risk-Stratification and Risk-Based, Protocol-Driven Management After Elective Major Cancer Surgery

Decision Analysis in SHared decision making for Thromboprophylaxis during Pregnancy (DASH-TOP): a sequential explanatory mixed-methods pilot study

A Novel Decision Aid for Surgical Patients with Ulcerative Colitis: Results of a Pilot Study

Prescriber decision-making on antithrombotic therapy after endovascular intervention for peripheral artery disease: a protocol for a discrete choice experiment

Patient similarity and other artificial intelligence machine learning algorithms in clinical decision aid for shared decision-making in the Prevention of Cardiovascular Toxicity (PACT): a feasibility trial design

A formalized shared decision-making process with individualized decision aids for older patients referred for cardiac surgery

Universal clinical decision support tool for thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized COVID-19 patients: post hoc analysis of the IMPROVE-DD cluster randomized trial

Decision Analysis in SHared decision making for Thromboprophylaxis during Pregnancy (DASH-TOP): a sequential explanatory mixed methods pilot study protocol

A decision support intervention for patients with advanced lung cancer amid growing therapeutic complexity: Results of a randomized controlled trial.

Pilot Testing a Patient Decision Aid as a Strategy to Reduce Overtreatment for Older Women with Early-Stage Breast Cancer

Avoiding the needle: A quality improvement program introducing apixaban for extended thromboprophylaxis after major gynecologic cancer surgery

Primary Outcomes Analysis of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of an Interactive Decision Tool for Patients with Breast Cancer.

Short-term versus extended chemoprophylaxis against venous thromboembolism in DIEP flap breast reconstruction: A retrospective study of 424 patients

Extended thromboprophylaxis following major abdominal/pelvic cancer-related surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature

A Decision Aid for Patients Considering Surgery for Sciatica: Codesign and User‐Testing With Patients and Clinicians

Assessment of a venous thromboembolism prophylaxis shared decision-making intervention (DASH-TOP) using the decisional conflict scale: a mixed-method study