Abstract:Problem definition: We study supply chain coordination in a setting with transshipment. We use centralized and decentralized transfer prices as a way to increase supply chain coordination. Academic/practical relevance: The ability to transship can improve channel efficiency by improving the match between supply and demand. We study how human decision makers behave in this setting and provide clear insights to improve coordination. Methodology: We use controlled laboratory experiments with financially incentivized human subjects. We study a broad set of critical ratios under both decentralized and centralized transfer-price settings. In the decentralized transfer-price setting, retailers negotiate a transfer price. In the centralized transfer-price setting, we use two different approaches: theoretical and behavioral transfer price. Both approaches suggest opposite recommendations. Results: Analytically, the optimal transfer price should depend on the critical ratio; but results from the decentralized setting show that participants set prices as if they ignore the critical ratio and instead focus on splitting potential profit from transshipped units in half. However, there is a positive relationship between transfer prices and ordering decisions. Moreover, generalizing the pull-to-center effect, we find that subjects do not place orders that coordinate the supply chain. For the centralized setting, we find that using the theoretical approach does not coordinate ordering decisions and does not improve decisions compared with the decentralized setting. The behavioral approach suggests a transfer price close to product selling price for a high critical ratio and a transfer price below product cost for a low critical ratio. These recommendations lead to coordinating ordering decisions. Managerial implications: We draw two practical conclusions from our research. First, transshipments are unambiguously beneficial, resulting in higher profitability, and, when feasible, should be encouraged. Second, when possible, transfer prices should be set centrally but taking into account subjects’ behavior. Otherwise, price negotiation might lead to better performance.

Unraveling the price-concentration relationship: The Role of national distribution centers in Chilean supermarket industry consolidation

Sustainable Food Value Chains: Approaches to Transaction Costs in Agro-Alimentary Systems of Developing Countries—A Chile Case Study

The Evolution of U.S. Retail Concentration

Local Retail Prices, Product Variety, and Neighborhood Change

Intermittent food deserts. Exploring the spatiotemporal dimension of the urban fresh food access in Chilean cities

A study of the relationship between degree of ethnocentrism and typologies of food purchase in supermarkets in central-southern Chile

Market structure in the Latin American mobile sector

Prices and Concentration: A U-shape? Theory and Evidence from Renewables

The Rapid Rise of Supermarkets in Costa Rica: Impact on Horticultural Markets

Price Setting in Chile: Micro Evidence from Consumer On-Line Prices During the Social Outbreak and Covid-19

Granular Linkages, Supplier Cost Shocks & Export Performance

UK retail concentration, Chilean wine producers and value chains

Competitive strategies in Southern Europe: the case of Spanish retailers

External competitiveness of Spanish canned fruit and vegetable businesses during the second half of the twentieth century

Drawing the Boundaries Between Hub-and-Spoke Cartels and Vertical Agreements: Lessons from the United Kingdom and the United States to Chilean Competition Law

Competition in the international cherry market: A competitiveness analysis of the developing country

Centralized or Decentralized Transfer Prices: A Behavioral Approach for Improving Supply Chain Coordination

From dominant to producer currency pricing: Dynamics of Chilean exports

Market concentration in industrial and commercial non-hazardous waste valorisation: the case of Chile

Multi-Category Competition and Market Power: A Model of Supermarket Pricing

Price competition and market concentration: Evidence from the land market in China