Abstract:Background Behavioural emergencies involving aggression in acute care hospitals are increasing globally. Acute care staff are often not trained or confident in their prevention or management. Of available training options simulation-based education is superior for clinical medical education and is gaining acceptance for teaching clinical aggression management skills. Objective The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review of the effectiveness of simulation-based education for teaching aggression management skills for health professionals working in acute health care settings. Methods The study protocol was prepared in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) statement, registered (27/02/2020) and published. We included randomised controlled trials, non-randomised controlled trials, quasi-experimental studies, and observational studies involving health care professionals in acute hospital settings or trainee health professionals who received simulation-based training on managing patient aggression. Comprehensive searches were conducted in PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL and The Cochrane Library. Two reviewers independently screened all records, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. The primary outcomes included patient outcomes, quality of care, and adverse effects. Secondary outcomes included workplace resource use, healthcare provider related outcomes, knowledge (de-escalation techniques), performance, attitudes, and satisfaction. A narrative synthesis of included studies was performed because substantial variation of interventions and outcome measures precluded meta-analyses. Results Twenty-five studies were included with 2790 participants, 2585 (93 %) acute care hospital staff and 205 (7 %) undergraduate university students. Twenty-two studies combined simulation-based education with at least one other training modality. Three studies were randomised controlled trials, one was a pilot and feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial, one was a three-group post-test design and twenty were pre −/post-test design. Twenty-four studies were deemed to be high/critical or serious risk of bias. Four studies collected primary outcome data, all using different methods and with inconsistent findings. Twenty-one studies assessed performance in the test situation, seven studies provided objective ratings of performance and eighteen provided self-report data. Twenty-three studies reported objective or subjective improvements in secondary outcomes. Conclusions Acute health care staff who completed simulation-based education on managing clinical aggression showed statistically significant improvements in knowledge and self-reported confidence. However, there is a lack of evidence about the magnitude of these improvements and impact on patient outcomes. Registration PROSPERO Registration Number CRD42020151002. Funding This study was funded in part by an Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship, the Elizabeth & Vernon Puzey and Rowden White Scholarships. The funders have no input into the planning or conduct of this review or the interpretation or publication of the study results. Tweetable abstract. Simulation-based education improved acute health care clinician knowledge and confidence in managing aggression.

Behavioral sciences applied to acute care teams: a research agenda for the years ahead by a European research network

Global Approaches to Integrated Care: Best Practices and Ongoing Innovation.

Teamwork matters: team situation awareness to build high-performing healthcare teams, a narrative review

Team behaviors as antecedents for team members' work engagement in interdisciplinary health care teams

Research Priority Setting: The Current Landscape of Neuroscience Nursing Research

A Research Agenda for Assessment and Management of Psychosis in Emergency Department Patients

Insights and advances in multidisciplinary critical care: a review of recent research

Understanding Best Practices in Implementation of Behavioral Emergency Response Teams Through a Scoping Review

The clinician, the clinician-researcher, and the contextual behavioral science research agenda

Recent advances in multidisciplinary critical care

Emergency medical care of patients with psychiatric disorders - challenges and opportunities: Results of a multicenter survey

Factors influencing the formation of balanced care teams: the organisation, performance, and perception of nursing care teams and the link with patient outcomes: a systematic scoping review

Large-Scale Interventions to Create Hospital Work Environments That Enhance Nurse–Physician Teamwork

Simulation-based education for teaching aggression management skills to health care providers in acute health care settings: A systematic review

Medical teamwork and the evolution of safety science: a critical review

Team functioning in Neurorehabilitation: a mixed methods study

ROAMER: roadmap for mental health research in Europe.

Effectiveness of pharmacological treatments for severe agitation in real-world emergency settings: protocol of individual-participant-data network meta-analysis

Engaging emergency medical services to improve postacute management of behavioural health emergency calls: a protocol of a scoping literature review

Improving the management of acutely agitated patients in the emergency department through implementation of Project BETA (Best Practices in the Evaluation and Treatment of Agitation)

[Blended Learning in Critical Care to Improve Quality of Care the ERIC-Training]