Team functioning in Neurorehabilitation: a mixed methods study

Ruud van der Veen,Stéphanie van der Burgt,Marsh Königs,Jaap Oosterlaan,Saskia Peerdeman
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2024.2325694
2024-03-14
Journal of Interprofessional Care
Abstract:The objective of this study was to enhance understanding of team functioning in a neurorehabilitation team by identifying the factors that impede and facilitate effective interprofessional team collaboration. We focused on team identification, psychological safety, and team learning, and conducted the research at a neurorehabilitation center treating young patients with severe acquired brain injury in the Netherlands. A mixed-methods approach was employed, integrating quantitative data from questionnaires ( N = 40) with qualitative insights from a focus group ( n = 6) and in-depth interviews ( n = 5) to provide a comprehensive perspective on team dynamics. Findings revealed strong team identification among participants, denoting a shared sense of belonging and commitment. However, limited psychological safety was observed, which negatively affected constructive conflict and team learning. Qualitative analysis further identified deficiencies in shared mental models, especially in shared decision-making and integrated care. These results highlight the crucial role of psychological safety in team learning and the development of shared mental models in neurorehabilitation settings. Although specific to neurorehabilitation, the insights gained may be applicable to enhancing team collaboration in various healthcare environments. The study forms a basis for future research to investigate the impact of improvements in team functioning on patient outcomes in similar settings.
health care sciences & services,health policy & services
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper mainly discusses the issue of team collaboration in neurorehabilitation teams. The research aims to enhance the understanding of team functioning by identifying the factors that influence effective interdisciplinary teamwork. The study focuses on three key factors: team identification, psychological safety, and team learning, which are investigated in a Dutch neurorehabilitation center for young patients with severe brain injury. The research found that team members have a strong sense of team identification, including a sense of belonging and commitment. However, there is limited psychological safety within the team, which hinders constructive conflict and team learning. Qualitative analysis also revealed the inadequacy of shared mental models, particularly in shared decision-making and integrated care. These findings highlight the importance of psychological safety in team learning and the development of shared mental models in the neurorehabilitation environment. Although the study focuses on neurorehabilitation, its insights may be applicable to enhancing team collaboration in various healthcare settings. The paper employed a mixed-methods research design, combining survey questionnaires (n=40), focus group discussions (n=6), and in-depth interviews (n=5) to comprehensively understand team dynamics. The research findings provide a foundation for future exploration of improving team functioning and its impact on patient outcomes in similar settings.