Abstract:The article is devoted to consideration of the competence of ASEAN in the field of human rights. Human rights are universal values agreed by the countries of the world. The main pillars of the international system of promotion and protection of human rights are regional mechanisms for the protection of human rights. The most prominent subregional organization in the Asia-Pacific region in terms of recent human rights developments is ASEAN. ASEAN is an international intergovernmental subregional organization of countries located in Southeast Asia. The ASEAN Charter enshrined human rights as a fundamental principle of ASEAN and created a mechanism to promote and protect the human rights and fundamental freedoms of ASEAN citizens. Respect for fundamental freedoms, the promotion and protection of human rights, and the promotion of social justice are among the general principles binding on member states. To ensure the implementation of the provisions of the Charter in the aspect of human rights protection, the ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights was established, which later adopted the ASEAN Declaration of Human Rights. But despite quite significant progress in the aspect of legal support of ASEAN's competence in the field of human rights, practical problems still exist today. In particular, one of the problematic issues that still exists within the Association is the provision of human rights in the region. After all, guided by the principle of non-interference in the internal affairs of states, ASEAN does not pay attention to events related to the violation of human rights in the territories of its member states. In addition, ASEAN does not have judicial bodies to consider cases of human rights violations by member countries, as European countries do. The ASEAN Commission itself does not have the authority to make binding decisions, consider cases or conduct investigative visits. The absence of such functions and the absence of mandatory requirements regarding the independence and experience of AICHR members lead to debate. At the same time, the provision concerning the scope of powers to make decisions only by consensus is subject to the most criticism. After all, every state can reject any criticism of its human rights by way of veto.

The Development of the Rule of Law in ASEAN: The State and Regional Integration

The Rule of Law in China and the Modernization of Higher Education Governance

Asean Law And Economic Growth Asean

ASEAN between globalization and regionalization

ASEAN’s soft law on marine environmental pollution

On the Development of the Rule of Law in Economy Developed Area

The Impact of Regional Economic Integration on International Commercial Law: The Cases of the EU and ASEAN

ASEAN and the Major Powers in the South China Sea: the Role of Law, Diplomacy, and Deterrence in Moderating Sovereignty Claims

Formulating regional logistics development policy: the case of ASEAN

ASEAN competence in the field of human rights

The South China Sea International Disputes with the ASEAN Area (in International Maritime Law)

The Rule of State Law and the Rule-of-Law State: Economic Analysis of the Legal Founations of Development

The Challenge of Cultural Diversity in Regional Integration: A Comparative Analysis of the EU and ASEAN

ASEAN, COVID-19 and Myanmar crisis: Dealing with critical juncture

An Elementary Approach to the Rule of Law

The Compliance of Regional Autonomy with State Administrative Court Decisions

The Asian Principles of Private International Law: Objectives, Contents, Structure and Selected Topics on Choice of Law

An Agreement to Disagree: The ASEAN Human Rights Declaration and the Absence of Regional Identity in Southeast Asia

The Legal Dimensions of Rule of Law Promotion in EU Foreign Policy – EU Treaty Imperatives and Rule of Law Conditionality in the Foreign Trade and Development Nexus

ASEAN as network governance: An alternative lens to evaluate policymaking and performance

‘New Regionalism’: ASEAN – RoK partnership in socio-cultural and education exchanges