Abstract:Background: The digitalization of health care has many potential benefits, but it may also negatively impact health care professionals' well-being. Burnout can, in part, result from inefficient work processes related to the suboptimal implementation and use of health information technologies. Although strategies to reduce stress and mitigate clinician burnout typically involve individual-based interventions, emerging evidence suggests that improving the experience of using health information technologies can have a notable impact. Objective: The aim of this systematic review was to collect evidence of the benefits and challenges associated with the use of digital tools in hospital settings with a particular focus on the experiences of health care professionals using these tools. Methods: We conducted a systematic literature review following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines to explore the experience of health care professionals with digital tools in hospital settings. Using a rigorous selection process to ensure the methodological quality and validity of the study results, we included qualitative studies with distinct data that described the experiences of physicians and nurses. A panel of 3 independent researchers performed iterative data analysis and identified thematic constructs. Results: Of the 1175 unique primary studies, we identified 17 (1.45%) publications that focused on health care professionals' experiences with various digital tools in their day-to-day practice. Of the 17 studies, 10 (59%) focused on clinical decision support tools, followed by 6 (35%) studies focusing on electronic health records and 1 (6%) on a remote patient-monitoring tool. We propose a theoretical framework for understanding the complex interplay between the use of digital tools, experience, and outcomes. We identified 6 constructs that encompass the positive and negative experiences of health care professionals when using digital tools, along with moderators and outcomes. Positive experiences included feeling confident, responsible, and satisfied, whereas negative experiences included frustration, feeling overwhelmed, and feeling frightened. Positive moderators that may reinforce the use of digital tools included sufficient training and adequate workflow integration, whereas negative moderators comprised unfavorable social structures and the lack of training. Positive outcomes included improved patient care and increased workflow efficiency, whereas negative outcomes included increased workload, increased safety risks, and issues with information quality. Conclusions: Although positive and negative outcomes and moderators that may affect the use of digital tools were commonly reported, the experiences of health care professionals, such as their thoughts and emotions, were less frequently discussed. On the basis of this finding, this study highlights the need for further research specifically targeting experiences as an important mediator of clinician well-being. It also emphasizes the importance of considering differences in the nature of specific tools as well as the profession and role of individual users. Trial registration: PROSPERO CRD42023393883; https://tinyurl.com/2htpzzxj.

Creating work-life balance among physicians in the age of digitalization: the role of self-consciousness and communication – a qualitative study

Frontline Perspectives on Physician Burnout and Strategies to Improve Well-Being: Interviews with Physicians and Health System Leaders

Willingness to migrate-a potential effect of burnout? A survey of Hungarian physicians

Experience of Health Care Professionals Using Digital Tools in the Hospital: Qualitative Systematic Review

Work and Environmental Factors on Job Burnout: A Cross-Sectional Study for Sustainable Work

The burden of the digital environment: a systematic review on organization-directed workplace interventions to mitigate physician burnout

Experiences of Public Doctors on Managing Work Difficulties and Maintaining Professional Enthusiasm in Acute General Hospitals: A Qualitative Study

Stress and burnout in the context of workplace psychosocial factors among mental health professionals during the later waves of the COVID-19 pandemic in Hungary

"Anxiety, COVID, Burnout and Now Depression": a Qualitative Study of Primary Care Clinicians' Perceptions of Burnout

Associations of perceived changes in work due to digitalization and the amount of digital work with job strain among physicians: a national representative sample

Differences in Physicians' Ratings of Work Stressors and Resources Associated With Digital Transformation: Cross-Sectional Study

Does digital health technology improve physicians' job satisfaction and work-life balance? A cross-sectional national survey and regression analysis using an instrumental variable

Association of physician burnout with perceived EHR work stress and potentially actionable factors

Exploring Physicians' Perceptions of Digital Health's Impact on the Patient-Physician Relationship in the Primary Health Care Setting: Qualitative Descriptive Study

High prevalence of burnout among midwives in Hungary: High job demands and low resources as potential persistent stressors, a focus on prevention

The Rise of the Empowered Physician in the Digital Health Era: Viewpoint

'It's like juggling fire daily': Well-being, workload and burnout in the British NHS - A survey of 721 physicians

Assessing Contributing and Mediating Factors of Telemedicine on Healthcare Provider Burnout

The Paradoxes of Digital Tools in Hospitals: Qualitative Interview Study

Assessing the prevalence of workplace telepressure on resident and attending physicians: A validated scale

Digital stressors and resources perceived by emergency physicians and associations to their digital stress perception, mental health, job satisfaction and work engagement