Crystal Structure Of The Dimeric Urm1 From The Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae
Jiang Yu,Cong-Zhao Zhou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.21975
2008-01-01
Abstract:Ubiquitins and ubiquitin-like modifier proteins regulate numerous cellular processes via covalent conjugation to the target substrates.1-3 To date, five ubiquitin-like pathways have been identified in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.4-6 A protein of 99 residues encoded by yeast open reading frame YIL008W was characterized as one of the ubiquitin-related modifiers (Urm1). Conjugation of Urm1 to its target proteins depends on the E1-like activating enzyme Uba4.7 A recent article on the solution structure and phylogenetic analyses of Urm1 indicated it might be a common ancestor of the entire ubiquitin superfamily.8 To date, little is known about the molecular function of urmylation pathway, but is required for normal growth, particularly at high temperature.7 Urm1 was also found to play important roles in budding and haploid invasive growth,9 posttranslational modification/proteolysis of the elongator subunit Tot1/YLR384C10 and oxidative stress response via modifying the alkyl hydroperoxide reductase Ahp1.11 Very recently, urmylation was also reported to participate in regulating the expression of genes involved in sensing and controlling amino acids levels.12 Oligomerization have been reported to be a common feature of ubiquitins and related modifiers.13 Ubiquitin forms polyubiquitin conjugation via isopeptide bonds between the active Lys of one monomer and the C-terminal Gly of another.3 SUMO-2/-3 forms oligomers in vitro via a specific consensus SUMOylation site, VKXE,14 which was further proved by the crystal structures of the human SUMO-2 protein in a possible assembly form of trimer.15 Nevertheless, the oligomerization of Urm1 has never been reported previously. Here, we reported the crystal structure of Urm1 from the yeast S. cerevisiae at 1.44 Å resolution, dimerized via hydrophobic and polar interactions, mainly contributed by the C-terminal residues. The stable dimer was also found to be the form of majority in solution. The dimerization of Urm1 might provide an autoprotection to the highly active C-terminal Gly residue before attacking its substrates. The URM1/YIL008W open reading frame was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), using S. cerevisiae S288c genomic DNA as the template, and cloned into a pET29a-derived plasmid (Novagen) without introducing any additional residues. The recombinant protein was overexpressed in E. coli Rosetta (DE3) strain at 37°C for 5 h. Pellets were collected by centrifugation at 8,000g for 10 min at 4°C and resuspended in 50 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.0, followed by sonication. After centrifugation at 25,000g for 30 min at 4°C, the supernatant was pooled and applied to an ion-exchange Q-FF column (Amersham Biosciences) equilibrated with 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.0. Elution of 40 mL volume was carried out by a linear gradient of NaCl from 0 to 1.0M at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. Urm1 was eluted at 250 mM NaCl and then pooled and loaded to a Superdex 200 16/60 column (Amersham Biosciences), equilibrated with 200 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.0. Fractions containing Urm1 were pooled, desalted, and concentrated to 10 mg/mL in a final buffer of 50 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.0, used for crystallization and analytical size exclusion chromatography. Protein concentration was determined by its absorbance at 280 nm with the theoretical molar extinction coefficient of 6,990 M−1 cm−1 (http://www.expasy.org). Urm1 was also cloned into pET15b plasmid (Novagen) with additional residues of MGSSHHHHHHSSGLVPRGH at the N-terminus. The recombinant protein Urm1-6xHis-tag was overexpressed by using Rosetta (DE3) strain of E. coli at 16°C for 20 h. Pellets were collected by centrifugation at 8000g for 10 min at 4°C and resuspended in 200 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.0, followed by sonication. After centrifugation at 25,000g for 30 min 4°C, the supernatant was collected and applied to a Ni2+-NTA column (Amersham Biosciences). The target protein was eluted with 300 mM imidazole in 200 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.0, and loaded to a Superdex 75 16/60 column, equilibrated with 200 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.0. Fractions containing the recombinant Urm1-6xHis-tag were pooled, desalted, and concentrated to 10 mg/mL in a final buffer of 50 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl. Protein concentration was determined by its absorbance at 280 nm with a theoretical molar extinction coefficient of 6990 M−1cm−1 (http://www.expasy.org). The crystals were grown at 289 K using the sitting-drop vapor-diffusion technique, with initial conditions formed by mixing equal volumes (1 μL) of the protein sample with mother liquor [0.2M MgCl2, 0.1M Tris, pH8.5, 30% polyethylene glycol (PEG) 4000]. Typically, crystals of about 0.30 × 0.30 × 0.05 mm3 appeared in a week. The crystal was transferred to the cryoprotectant of the reservoir solution supplemented with 25% glycerol and flash cooled with liquid nitrogen. The X-ray diffraction data were collected at 100 K in a liquid nitrogen stream using a Rigaku MM007 X-ray generator (λ = 1.5418 Å) with a MarResearch 345 image-plate detector at School of Life Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China (USTC, Hefei, China). Data were processed using the program AUTOMAR 1.2.16 The crystal structure of Urm1 was solved by the molecular replacement method with the program Phaser17 using the mean solution structure of Urm1 (PDB code 2AX5) without the flexible residues at both termini as the search model. According to the 2Fo-Fc and Fo-Fc maps, the initial model was fitted and rebuilt with the program O18 and refined with program CNS19 using reflections between 30 and 3.0 Å with 5% of the data set reserved for Rfree. When the Rfactor and Rfree were decreased to 43.8% and 44.7%, respectively, the resultant model was applied to restrained refinement with REFMAC5.18, 20 As refinement progressed, the resolution was extended to 1.44 Å and anisotropic temperature factors were applied in refinement. Finally, 248 water molecules, two magnesium ions, and one ethylene glycol (EDO) were added according to the Fo-Fc map. The side chains of eight residues were modeled in two discrete alternative conformations. The stereochemical quality of the final structure was verified using the program PROCHECK V 3.4.4.21 The data collection parameters, final refinement statistics, and the overall quality parameters of the structure were listed in Table I. All figures were prepared with the program PyMOL.22 An aliquot of 20 μL protein mixture of molecular weight (MW) maker was loaded to HPLC size exclusion column Bio-Sil SEC 400-5 (Bio-Rad), equilibrated with 50 mM NaCl, 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 6.5, followed by elution at a flow rate of 1 mL/min, and absorbance measured at 280 nm. The protein markers are bovine thyroglobulin (670 kDa), bovine γ-globulin (158 kDa), chicken ovalbumin (44 kDa), horse myoglobin (17 kDa), yeast recombinant Grx1 (13.4 kDa), and Grx2 (14.1 kDa). Using the peak elution volumes, the standard curve equation was determined as Log MW= −0.6369Ve + 10.948 with the R2 value of 0.922. Urm1 was diluted to 10 μM in the same sodium phosphate buffer and then loaded to the column. The molecular weight of Urm1 was calculated from the equation with its peak elution volume. Urm1 (11.0 kDa) and Urm1-6xHis-tag (13.1 kDa) were mixed with a molar ratio of 10:1. The mixture was added to 10 mL buffer of 200 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.0 with 8M urea, followed by slow dialysis at 4°C overnight to a final buffer of 200 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.0 with 1.5M urea. The sample was then collected, desalted to remove the residual urea and concentrated in a final buffer of 50 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.0. Then, 50 μL protein sample was added with 20 μL Ni2+-NTA gel and incubated at room temperature for 5 min. Supernatant was removed after centrifugation at 10,000g for 1 min. The sediment was resuspended with 60 μL washing buffer of 50 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.0, followed by centrifugation as above to remove supernatant containing unbound Urm1. After the gel was washed three times, Urm1-6xHis-tag was then eluted with 60 μL washing buffer containing 300 mM imidazole, followed by centrifugation. All supernatants were applied to SDS-PAGE to check the protein. The overall fold of Urm1 crystal structure resembles its solution structure (Fig. 1), with a five-strand β-sheet and four helices on the concave side of the curved β-sheet. Nevertheless, the main chain superposition between the crystal structure and the mean solution structure gave a root-mean-square deviation (r.m.s.d.) of 1.192 Å, mainly due to the region from Pro49 to Ile61 and the C terminus. The former region consists of helix α3′ flanked by a loop on each side in the solution structure [Fig. 1(B)], compared with a region of helices α2 and η2 followed by a small antiparallel β-sheet composed of β3 and β4 in the crystal structure [Fig. 1(A)]. In the solution structure strand β4′ is absent from the cartoon representation but identified by nuclear overhauser effect (NOE) connectivity,8 while in the crystal structure this β-strand was numbered as strand β6. Besides, helices η3 and η4 were identified in the crystal structure, which is corresponding to helix α4′ in the solution structure. Cartoon representation of the overall fold of Urm1 in (A) the crystal structure and (B) the mean solution structure, colored and labeled according to the secondary structures. Strand β4′ in the solution structure was identified by NOE connectivity. In Urm1 solution structure, the C terminus from Thr95 to Gly99 extends as a flexible tail protruding to the solvent, probably due to the C-terminal tag LEHHHHHH introduced during cloning.8 In contrast, the C-terminal tail twists and covers the region between strands β4 and β5 in the crystal structure [Fig. 1(A)]. Although there is only one Urm1 molecule in an asymmetric unit of the crystal structure, crystal packing produces two possible dimeric assemblies. Calculated with the program AreaIMol in CCP4,23 the contact area of two dimeric assemblies is 297 and 692 Å2, respectively. The larger one accounts for 13.7% of the total molecular surface area [Fig. 2(A)], which is assumed to be the majority of Urm1 dimer. LIGPLOT26 diagram represents that the interface is formed by residues of Glu7, Gly10, Asp13, Arg20, Ile66, Leu68, Asp71, Asp73, Glu75, and Thr93 to Gly99, and a group of water molecules [Fig. 2(B)]. Hydrophobic interactions are found contributed by Gly10, Ile66, Leu68, Asp71, Asp 73, Thr93, Leu96, His97, and Gly99. Beside Ile66, Leu68, and Gly99, other residues are also involved in polar interactions, some of which forming hydrogen bonds mediated by water molecules. These residues are highly conserved among the Urm1 homologues, and C-terminal residues are almost identical [Fig. 2(C)]. The structure of Urm1 crystal obtained from the crystallization condition of 30% PEG8000, 0.1M sodium cacodylate, pH 6.5, and 0.2M NaAc also showed the same crystal packing and conformation of the C-terminal tail (data not shown). This indicated that Urm1 is of great possibility to form a dimer at the pH range from 6.5 to 8.5, which is close to the physiological pH value. A: Dimeric Urm1 in the crystal structure. Monomers are colored in yellow and lightblue, respectively. The N terminus and C terminus are labeled, accordingly. B: LIGPLOT diagram of the interface of dimeric Urm1. Residues at the first surface are colored in blue, residues at the second surface in brown; hydrogen bonds are shown as green dashed lines, labeled in Angstrom; residues in hydrophobic contacts are presented by semicircle with radiating spokes. C: Multiple sequence alignment of Urm1 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae to its homologs from other species. The alignment was performed using MultAlin and ESPript (http://prodes.toulouse.inra.fr/multalin).24, 25 The secondary structural elements are identified from Urm1 (PDB code 2QJL) using ESPript and displayed at the top of the alignment. The α-helices, η-helices, β-sheets, and strict β-turns are denoted α, η, β, and TT, correspondingly. Residues of >70% consensus level are in blue rectangle. Completely conserved residues are indicated by white lettering on a red background. The residues involved in intermolecular interactions are indicated by asterisks at the bottom of the alignment. In an attempt to verify if Urm1 exists as a dimer in solution as well, we determined its molecular weight (MW) with 10 μM protein in the solution of 50 mM NaCl, 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 6.5. Calculated from the standard curve [Fig. 3(A)], the MW of Urm1 is 21.9 kD, which is very close to twice of the theoretical MW of the monomer (11.0 kDa). In addition, no elution peak of the monomer was found, which suggested the majority of Urm1 exists as dimer in the solution. Furthermore, renaturation between Urm1 (11.0 kDa, without any additional tag) and Urm1-6xHis-tag (13.1 kDa) was applied to check the existence of dimeric Urm1 in solution. During renaturation, heterodimeric Urm1 was speculated to be formed between Urm1 and Urm1-6xHis-tag. Urm1-6xHis-tag was then chelated with Ni2+-NTA gel and the redundant Urm1 was removed completely by centrifugation and washing. As shown in Figure 3(B), the imidazole elution sample in lane 7 contained two bands corresponding to Urm1 and Urm1-6xHis-tag, respectively, which validated the existence of dimeric Urm1 in solution. A: The molecular weight of Urm1 in the buffer of 50 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tirs, pH 7.0, determined from the standard curve of analytical size exclusion chromatography. The protein markers are bovine thyroglobulin (670 kDa), bovine γ-globulin (158 kDa), chicken ovalbumin (44 kDa), horse myoglobin (17 kDa), recombinant yeast Grx1 (13.4 kDa), and Grx2 (14.1 kDa). B: SDS-PAGE analysis of renaturation samples applied to Ni2+-NTA gel. Lane 1, renaturation sample; lane 2, marker; lane 3, unbound Urm1 to Ni2+-NTA gel; lane 4, first gel washing; lane 5, second gel washing; lane 6, third gel washing; lane 7, elution with buffer containing 300 mM imidazole. Numbers on the left indicate the positions of MW standards (in kDa). Taken together, Urm1 forms a dimer either in solution or in the crystal packing. The dimeric form will block the mobile C-terminal Gly-Gly, which could provide an autoprotection of this active site. As we know, the C-terminus of Urm1 should be recognized and activated by E1-like Uba4 before conjugation, as strongly indicated from the bacterial counterpart MoaD-MoeB complex.27 Thus, the dipeptide Gly-Gly of Urm1 should be exposed to let it accessible to its protein partners, not only for activation but also for conjugation. But what triggers the dissociation of Urm1 dimer remains an open question. We also thank Mr. Zhiqiang Zhu at USTC for advice on structure solution.