Abstract:Purpose: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries cause changes in tibiofemoral joint kinematics and can lead to early onset of osteoarthritis (OA) despite surgical reconstruction. Changes in kinematics may alter the contact area (CA) between the femoral and tibial cartilage surfaces. Evaluations of the tibiofemoral CA in ACL injured individuals can help understand the mechanism behind cartilage degeneration seen after ACL injury and reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to determine the changes in tibiofemoral CA and their positions at the time of injury and after reconstruction. Methods: Subjects: Bilateral knee MRI scans of thirty healthy adults (15 males, age = 28.93 ± 7.81 years, BMI = 23.44 ± 2.74 kg/m2) with isolated unilateral ACL injuries were obtained within 6 months of their injury (i.e. baseline) prior to surgery and again at 1 year after ACL reconstruction. Fourteen healthy control subjects (10 males, age = 31.78 ± 4.80 years, BMI = 24.01 ± 2.26 kg/m2) with no history of knee injuries were recruited for comparison. Exclusion criteria included prior diagnosis of cartilage degeneration, inflammatory arthritis, or surgery in either knee. MRI Protocol: Subjects' knees were scanned with a 3 Tesla MRI scanner (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA) with an 8-channel phased array knee coil (Invivo, Orlando, FL, USA). Sagittal T2 fast spin-echo (FSE) images with TR/TE = 4000/49.3 ms, slice thickness of 1.5 mm, field of view of 16 cm, 512 x 512 matrix size and echo train length 9 were obtained at extension, loaded axially with of 25% total body weight. Image Processing: Regions of interest were delineated in FSE images with an in-house Matlab program using a spline-based semi-automated segmentation algorithm. The midpoint between the tibial medial and lateral posterior cortical border was defined as the origin of the tibial coordinate system. Tibiofemoral cartilage CA was defined as the weight bearing regions on the tibial surface (Figure 1). Fluids indicated by hyperintensity and menisci were excluded along with areas close to the tibial spine. CA centroid position (CP) was defined as the geometric center of CA projected onto the axial plane. The flexion angle (FA) was defined by the angle between the lines through the midshaft of femur and tibia in the anteroposterior (AP) direction. A single observer processed all MR images and all measurements were taken in the extended position. Statistical Analysis: Reliability was measured using Intraclass Correlation coefficient (ICC) over three trials of 10 control subjects. Differences in mean CA and CP between groups and longitudinal changes from baseline to 1 year were measured with a Student's t-test. Significance was defined as P<0.05 for all analyses. Results: Reliability: The intra-operator ICC's were 0.922 and 0.942 for medial and lateral CA respectively, and 0.996 and 0.996 for medial and lateral CP. Contact Area: Medial CA was larger in injured knees compared to control knees at both time points and the difference reached significance at one year (P=0.036). For the medial CA, there were significant differences between contralateral and control knees at baseline and one year (P=0.043 and P=0.008). There was no significant difference between injured and contralateral knees at the two time points (Table 1). Centroid Position: CP along the AP direction was significantly more posterior for the injured knees compared to the contralateral knees at baseline for both medial and lateral regions (P=0.001 and p=0.043). No significant difference was found between injured and control knees or between contralateral and control knees (Table 2). Conclusions: ACL injured subjects had increased in the medial CA for both injured and contralateral knees compared to the controls. The difference between contralateral and control knees suggests that there may be inherent differences in knee kinematics of ACL injured patients. Lack of significant difference in CA between the two time points indicates that reconstruction did not restore CA and knee kinematics. Overall, the result of the study shows altered knee kinematics in those with ACL injuries. Increased CA may indicate changes in knee kinematics that could lead to ACL tears and OA. Acknowledgement: This study is supported by the grant NIH/NIAMS P50 AR060752.View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT)View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT)

The Influence of Knee Position on Ultrasound Imaging of Femoral Cartilage in Individuals with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Associations Between Body Mass Index, Gait Biomechanics, and In Vivo Cartilage Function After Exercise in Those With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment of Cartilage Status: A Comparison Between Young Men with and Without Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Evaluation of Tibiofemoral Cartilage, Contact Area Alterations in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injured Patients

Associations between Body Mass Index, Gait Mechanics and Trochlear Cartilage Thickness in those with ACL Reconstruction

Differences in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Between the Surgical Side and Healthy Side of Knee Joint after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

The Value of Ultrasound Diagnostic Imaging of Anterior Crucial Ligament Tears Verified Using Experimental and Arthroscopic Investigations

A Prospective Evaluation of Femoral Tunnel Placement for Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using 3-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Anterior cruciate ligament injury and age affect knee cartilage T2 but not thickness

Using 3D MRI Bone Shape to Predict Pre-Osteoarthritis of the Knee 2 Years After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Relationships Between Running Biomechanics and Femoral Articular Cartilage Thickness and Composition in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Patients

In the Acute Phase of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture: Quantitative Assessment of Matrix Changes and Correlation between Different States of Meniscus and Adjacent Cartilage

An in Vivo Prediction of Anisometry and Strain in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction - A Combined Magnetic Resonance and Dual Fluoroscopic Imaging Analysis.

The Position of the Posterolateral Bundle Femoral Tunnel During Arthroscopic Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Cadaveric Study

Evaluation of Subchondral Bone Marrow Lipids of Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament (Acl)-Injured Patients at 3 T.

The Presence of Cartilage Affects Femoral Rotational Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Surgical parameters influence paediatric knee kinematics and cartilage stresses in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Navigating subject-specific variability using neuromusculoskeletal-finite element modelling analysis

Influence of a Concomitant Medial Meniscus Injury on Knee Joint Function and Osteoarthritis Presence after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Effects of Higher Femoral Tunnels on Clinical Outcomes, MRI, and Second-Look Findings in Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with a Minimal 5-Year Follow-Up.

Augmentation of Anterolateral Structures of the Knee Causes Undesirable Tibiofemoral Cartilage Contact in Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction-A Randomized In-Vivo Biomechanics Study.

The Apex of the Deep Cartilage is a Stable Landmark to Evaluate the Femoral Tunnel Position in ACL Reconstruction.