Abstract:Recent advances in dental resin based restorative materials have given rise to development of composites for bulk placement, to replace the need for incremental layering. Clinical consequences of microleakage are secondary caries, pulp inflammation, marginal discoloration, postoperative sensitivity, and the longevity of filling. Surface hardness is one of the mechanical properties of the restoration that should always be taken into account, particularly when they are faced with large areas of heavy masticatory forces. Accordingly, the current study was conducted to investigate the effect of packing technique and curing time on the marginal sealing and surface hardness of two bulk fill resin composites.Standardized class II proximal box cavities were prepared on the mesial and distal surface of the selected premolar teeth with the total of 48 cavities. The prepared cavities were randomly divided into 2 main groups, 24 cavities each, according to the placement technique used for cavity restoration either placement of bulkfill single increment of 4 mm depth or incremental placement of two increments of 2 mm each. Each group was subdivided into 2 subgroups, 12 cavities each, according to the bulk fill composite resin used; X-trafil bulkfill composite and Quixfil bulkfill composite. These subgroups were then subdivided into two smaller groups, 6 cavities each, according to the curing times either curing for 10 seconds following the manufacturers’ instructions or curing for 20 seconds. For all specimens, after bonding procedures, bulk-fill resin composites were manipulated and applied in cavities as the previously assigned methodology, specimens were then immersed in 2% methylene blue dye for 24 hours. Teeth were sectioned and viewed under a binocular stereomicroscope. Readings were recorded.A total of 80 cylindrical resin composite specimens were prepared. samples were divided into 4 groups according to the type of bulk fill composite (X-tra fil or Quixfil) and irradiation time (10s or 20s). The resin composite was applied in the mold, covered with mylar strips and light cured using LED light curing unit with an intensity of 1200mW/cm2. Vickers Microhardness tester was used with microindentation carried out using a load of 500g. Three readings for each surface were taken and an average reading was calculated. X-trafil bulkfill composite showed significantly lower degree of leakage than Quixfil bulkfill composite. No significant difference in microleakage was shown between different curing times nor different application techniques. X-trafil bulkfill composite showed significantly higher microhardness than Quixfil bulkfill composite Curing for 10 seconds showed significantly higher microhardness. Bulk-fill single increment of 4 mm recorded significantly higher microhardness value. Within the limitations of the current study, we can conclude that 4-mm bulk fill packing of bulkfill composite resin, cured for 10 seconds, had adequate marginal sealing performance. Surface microhardness of bulkfill composite resin packed at 4-mm bulk fill, cured for 10 seconds, is acceptable.

Micro-Hardness and Surface Roughness of Bulk-Fill Composite Resin: Effect of Surface Sealant Application and Two Bleaching Regimens

Effect of bleaching protocols on surface roughness and color change of high- and low-viscosity bulk-fill composite resins.

Effect of packing technique and curing time on the marginal sealing and surface hardness of two bulk-fill resin composites

Effects of Bleaching Gels on the Surface Microhardness of Tooth-Colored Restorative Materials in Situ

Effect of cold light bleaching on the surface micro-hardness and surface roughness of resin composites

Effect of surface sealant on the color stability and whiteness index of single-shade resin composites after staining and bleaching

3D Surface Profile and Color Stability of Tooth Colored Filling Materials after Bleaching

Effect of laser irradiation during in-office tooth bleaching on surface properties of resin-based restorative materials

Evaluation of surface microhardness and gingival marginal adaptation of three different bulk‐fill flowable resin composites: A comparative study

The Effect of Different Finishing and Polishing Systems on Surface Properties of New Flowable Bulk-fill Resin Composite

Evaluation of Light Curing Distance and Mylar Strips Color on Surface Hardness of Two Different Dental Composite Resins

Effect of peroxide‐free and peroxide‐based in‐office bleaching on the surface and mechanical properties of CAD/CAM esthetic restorative materials

An In Vitro Comparative Evaluation of the Effects of Different Bleaching Agents on Marginal Integrity of Two Different Restorative Resin Materials: An Analysis by Confocal Laser Microscopy

"Comparative evaluation of effect of toothbrush-dentifrice abrasion on surface roughness of resin composites with different filler loading:" An in vitro study

Surface Properties and Color Stability of Incrementally-Filled and Bulk-Fill Composites after in Vitro Toothbrushing.

Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid composite resin and ormocer-based tooth-colored restorative materials after several finishing and polishing procedures

Effects of microabrasion and bleaching on color and shear bond strength of simulated stained-remineralized caries lesions

Effects of Time-Elapsed Bleaching on the Surface and Mechanical Properties of Dentin Substrate Using Hydrogen Peroxide-Free Nanohydroxyapatite Gel

Effect of Aging and Bleaching on the Color Stability and Surface Roughness of a Recently Introduced Single-Shade Composite Resin.

Hydrogen Peroxide Bleaching Induces Changes in the Physical Properties of Dental Restorative Materials: Effects of Study Protocols

Effect of bleaching agents and whitening dentifrices on the surface roughness of human teeth enamel