Abstract:Purpose In the context of China’s efforts to build world-class enterprises through mixed-ownership reform, this study aims to build an agency theory framework to analyze the differential relation between ownership structure and firm performance in majority versus minority state-owned enterprises (SOEs). It also evaluates the differential influence that political connectedness has on firm performance in the two types of SOEs. Design/methodology/approach Using a panel data set of Chinese state-controlled mixed-ownership enterprises covering the period 2010–2019, this paper uses ordinary least squares, random-effects, fixed-effects and three stage least squares regression analysis to study the differential impact of ownership structure and political connectedness on firm performance in majority versus minority SOEs. Findings In minority SOEs, firm performance is positively related to the ownership share of the largest private shareholder and state ownership positively moderates this relation. Furthermore, minority SOEs with a politically connected chairman perform worse than those with a politically connected chairman. In majority SOEs, there is no relation between the ownership share of the largest private shareholder and firm performance. In addition, majority SOEs with a politically connected chairman perform similar to those without a politically connected chairman. Originality/value The theoretical framework demonstrates that agency problems are substantially different in minority versus majority SOEs and that this influences how changes in ownership structure and in the type of chairman that is assigned affect firm performance. The empirical analysis confirms these predictions.

Mixed ownership reform, political connections, and overinvestment

Disproportionate Ownership Structure and IPO Long-Run Performance of Non-Soes in China

Disproportional Ownership Structure and Stock Market Liquidity in China

Political Connections, Founding Family Ownership and Leverage Decision of Privately Owned Firms

Does the mixed ownership reform work? Influence of board chair on performance of state-owned enterprises

How mixed ownership affects investment efficiency? evidence from state-owned enterprises in China

Mixed-ownership reform and strategic choice of Chinese state-owned enterprises

Building world-class enterprises though mixed-ownership reform: explaining performance differences in minority and majority state-owned enterprises

Mixed ownership reform and non-state-owned enterprise innovation: Evidence from China

Mixed ownership reform and the short-term debt for long-term investment of non-state-owned enterprises: Evidence from China

Mixed Ownership Reform of State-Owned Enterprises and R&D Investment

Non-state shareholder governance and corporate innovation efficiency under the background of mixed ownership reform: evidence from China

The Effects of Nonstate Shareholder on the Excess Perquisites: Evidence from Chinese Mixed Ownership Reform

Mixed-Ownership Reform and Private Firms’ Corporate Social Responsibility Practices: Evidence From China

Mixed-ownership reform and factor misallocation: Evidence from China

Can private enterprises improve their investment efficiency by participating in the mixed-ownership reform of state-owned enterprises? Evidence from China

Impact of mixed ownership reforms on firm innovation–empirical evidence from China

The Impact of Mixed-Ownership Reform on Innovation Performance of Manufacturing Companies: Evidence from China

Heterogeneous Blockholders and Enterprise Innovation: Evidence From the Mixed-Ownership Reform in China

State‐owned equity and innovation performance of mixed‐ownership enterprises in China: The moderating effect of marketization