Abstract:Purpose In the context of China’s efforts to build world-class enterprises through mixed-ownership reform, this study aims to build an agency theory framework to analyze the differential relation between ownership structure and firm performance in majority versus minority state-owned enterprises (SOEs). It also evaluates the differential influence that political connectedness has on firm performance in the two types of SOEs. Design/methodology/approach Using a panel data set of Chinese state-controlled mixed-ownership enterprises covering the period 2010–2019, this paper uses ordinary least squares, random-effects, fixed-effects and three stage least squares regression analysis to study the differential impact of ownership structure and political connectedness on firm performance in majority versus minority SOEs. Findings In minority SOEs, firm performance is positively related to the ownership share of the largest private shareholder and state ownership positively moderates this relation. Furthermore, minority SOEs with a politically connected chairman perform worse than those with a politically connected chairman. In majority SOEs, there is no relation between the ownership share of the largest private shareholder and firm performance. In addition, majority SOEs with a politically connected chairman perform similar to those without a politically connected chairman. Originality/value The theoretical framework demonstrates that agency problems are substantially different in minority versus majority SOEs and that this influences how changes in ownership structure and in the type of chairman that is assigned affect firm performance. The empirical analysis confirms these predictions.

Building world-class enterprises though mixed-ownership reform: explaining performance differences in minority and majority state-owned enterprises

How Do Political Connections Cause SOEs and Non‐soes to Make Different M&A Decisions/performance? Evidence from China

Does the mixed ownership reform work? Influence of board chair on performance of state-owned enterprises

Mixed ownership reform, political connections, and overinvestment

Executive political connections and firm performance: Comparative evidence from privately-controlled and state-owned enterprises

How mixed ownership affects investment efficiency? evidence from state-owned enterprises in China

Mixed-ownership reform and strategic choice of Chinese state-owned enterprises

Pecking Order of Mixed Ownership :The Logic of Market

The Performance Impact of Firm Ownership Transformation in China

State ownership and firm performance: Empirical evidence from Chinese listed companies

Determinants of state equity ownership, and its effect on value/performance: China's privatized firms

Ownership, performance and executive turnover in China

Mixed-ownership Reform and Innovation: an Examination of State-Owned Enterprises

Mixed-ownership reform and factor misallocation: Evidence from China

Mixed Ownership Reform of State-Owned Enterprises and R&D Investment

China’s Mixed-Ownership Reform and SOE Profitability

Competition or Ownership——An Empirical Investigation to the Mechanism of SOEs

Aligning the Interests of Multiple Principals: Ownership Concentration and Profitability in China's Publicly-Traded Firms

The Moderating Effects of Ownership Structure on the Relationship Between R&D Input and Firm Performance: an Empirical Study Based on Listed SOEs

Do state-owned enterprises prefer capital from private enterprises with better ESG performance? Evidence from China's mixed ownership reforms