Abstract:Introduction In England, primary care networks (PCNs) offer opportunities to improve access to and sustainability of general practice through collaboration between groups of practices to provide care with a broader range of practitioner roles. However, there are concerns that these changes may undermine continuity of care. Our study investigates what the organisational shift to PCNs means for continuity of care. Methods The paper uses thematic analysis of qualitative data from interviews with general practitioners and other healthcare professionals (HCPs, n = 33) in 19 practices in five PCNs, and their patients (n = 35). Three patient cohorts within each participating practice were recruited, based on anticipated higher or lower needs for continuity of care: patients over 65 years with polypharmacy, patients with anxiety or depression and 'working age' adults aged between 18 and 45 years. Findings Patients and clinicians perceived changes to continuity in PCNs in our study. Larger‐scale care provision in PCNs required better care coordination and information‐sharing processes, aimed at improving care for 'vulnerable' patients in target groups. However, new working arrangements and ways of delivering care in PCNs undermine HCPs' ability to maintain continuity through ongoing relationships with patients. Patients experience this in terms of reduced availability of their preferred clinician, inefficiencies in care and unfamiliarity of new staff, roles and processes. Conclusions New practitioners need to be effectively integrated to support effective team‐based care. However, for patients, especially those not deemed 'vulnerable', this may not be sufficient to counter the loss of relationship with their practice. Therefore, caution is required in relation to designating patients as in need of, or not in need of continuity. Rather, continuity for all patients could be maintained through a dynamic understanding of the need for it as fluctuating and situational and by supporting clinicians to provide follow‐up care. Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) A PPI group was recruited and consulted during the study for feedback on the study design, recruitment materials and interpretation of findings.

Helen Salisbury: Primary care networks in a tangle

Helen Salisbury: New doesn't mean better

Investigating the impact of primary care networks on continuity of care in English general practice: Analysis of interviews with patients and clinicians from a mixed methods study

Helen Salisbury: A consultant model of general practice

Helen Salisbury: Funding GPs through the additional roles scheme won't solve GP unemployment

Helen Salisbury: Risk and responsibility when working with physician associates

Helen Salisbury: Physician associates have no role in general practice

Incorporation of a specialist mental health clinical pharmacist within a primary care network: patient referrals, prescribing decisions, and clinical outcomes

GP Networks Could Be Answer to Integrated Care, Report Says.

Identifying where hospital and community trusts are managing general practices in England: a service mapping study

Physician associates in primary health care in England: A challenge to professional boundaries?

Helen Salisbury: Ensuring the safety of physician associates' practice

Helen Salisbury: Blurring the boundaries of the medical profession

Helen Salisbury: GPs aren't to blame for delays in emergency departments

Self-care of Canterbury general practitioners, nurse practitioners, practice nurses and community pharmacists

General Practitioner’s Experience of Public-Private Partnerships to Develop Team-Based Care: A Qualitative Study

Creating a financially sound primary care network

Helen Salisbury: Smartwatches and playing fields

Regional variation in practitioner employment in general practices in England: a comparative analysis

Protocol: Remote care as the 'new normal'? Multi-site case study in UK general practice

Interprofessional teamwork in comprehensive primary healthcare services: Findings from a mixed methods study