Abstract:Background Although limited in predictive accuracy, polygenic scores (PGS) for educational outcomes are currently available to the public via direct-to-consumer genetic testing companies. Further, there is a growing movement to apply PGS in educational settings via 'precision education.' Prior scholarship highlights the potentially negative impacts of such applications, as disappointing results may give rise a "polygenic Pygmalion effect." In this paper two studies were conducted to identify factors that may mitigate or exacerbate negative impacts of PGS. Methods Two studies were conducted. In each, 1188 students were randomized to one of four conditions: Low-percentile polygenic score for educational attainment (EA-PGS), Low EA-PGS + Mitigating information, Low EA-PGS + Exacerbating information, or Control. Regression analyses were used to examine differences between conditions. Results In Study 1, participants randomized to Control reported significantly higher on the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES), Competence Scale (CS), Academic Efficacy Scale (AES) and Educational Potential Scale (EPS). CS was significantly higher in the Low EA-PGS + Mitigating information condition. CS and AES were significantly lower in the Low EA-PGS + Exacerbating information condition compared to the Low EA-PGS + Mitigating information condition. In Study 2, participants randomized to Control reported significantly higher CS and AES. Pairwise comparisons did not show significant differences in CS and AES. Follow-up pairwise comparisons using Tukey P -value correction did not find significant associations between non-control conditions. Conclusion These studies replicated the polygenic Pygmalion effect yet were insufficiently powered to detect significant effects of mitigating contextual information. Regardless of contextual information, disappointing EA-PGS results were significantly associated with lower assessments of self-esteem, competence, academic efficacy, and educational potential.

The Geneticization of Education and Its Bioethical Implications

Bringing up the bio-datafied child: scientific and ethical controversies over computational biology in education

Implications of the genomic revolution for education research and policy

Getting a head start: the importance of personal genetics education in high schools

Direct-to-consumer genetic testing in the news: a descriptive analysis

The genetics revolution. Ethical, legal, and insurance concerns

Exploring the Public Understanding of Basic Genetic Concepts

Types of genetic determinism in direct-to-consumer genetic testing for health

Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Polygenetic Conditions: A Legal, Ethical, and Scientific Challenge

Genetic Counseling, Personalized Medicine, and Precision Health

Health and Kinship Matter: Learning About Direct-To-Consumer Genetic Testing User Experiences via Online Discussions

Genomic Essentialism: Its Provenance and Trajectory as an Anticipatory Ethical Concern

Schoolhouse risk: Can we mitigate the polygenic Pygmalion effect?

"23andMe confirms: I'm super white" -- Analyzing Twitter Discourse On Genetic Testing

The law of genetic privacy: applications, implications, and limitations

Ethical issues raised by new genomic technologies: the case study of newborn genome screening

Genetic and Genomic Consultation: Are We Ready for Direct-to-Consumer Telegenetics?

Using Critical Literacy to Explore Genetics and its Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues with In-Service Secondary Teachers

Artificial Intelligence and the Weaponization of Genetic Data

"Doing genetic literacy": a discourse-oriented approach to literacy in genetic contexts

Typological thinking in human genomics research contributes to the production and prominence of scientific racism