Abstract:Green infrastructure plays a vital role in urban ecosystems. This includes sustaining biodiversity and human health. Despite a large number of studies investigating greenspace disparities in suburban areas, no known studies have compared the green attributes (e.g., trees, greenness, and greenspaces) of urban centres. Consequently, there may be uncharacterised socioecological disparities between the cores of urban areas (e.g., city centres). This is important because people spend considerable time in urban centres due to employment, retail and leisure opportunities. Therefore, the availability of--and disparities in--green infrastructure in urban centres can affect many lives and potentially underscore a socio-ecological justice issue. To facilitate comparisons between urban centres in Great Britain, we analysed open data of urban centre boundaries with a central business district and population of ≥100,000 (n = 68). Given the various elements that contribute to 'greenness', we combine a range of different measurements (trees, greenness, and accessible greenspaces) into a single indicator. We applied the normalised difference vegetation index (NDVI) to estimate the mean greenness of urban centres and the wider urban area (using a 1 km buffer) and determined the proportion of publicly accessible greenspace within each urban centre with Ordnance Survey Open Greenspace data. Finally, we applied a land cover classification algorithm using i-Tree Canopy to estimate tree coverage. This is the first study to define and rank urban centres based on multiple green attributes. The results suggest important differences in the proportion of green attributes between urban centres. For instance, Exeter scored the highest with a mean NDVI of 0.15, a tree coverage of 11.67%, and an OS Greenspace coverage of 0.05%, and Glasgow the lowest with a mean NDVI of 0.02, a tree cover of 1.95% and an OS Greenspace coverage of 0.00%. We also demonstrated that population size negatively associated with greenness and tree coverage, but not greenspaces, and that green attributes negatively associated with deprivation. This is important because it suggests that health-promoting and biodiversity-supporting resources diminish as population and deprivation increase. Disparities in green infrastructure across the country, along with the population and deprivation-associated trends, are important in terms of socioecological and equity justice. This study provides a baseline and stimulus to help local authorities and urban planners create and monitor equitable greening interventions in urban/city centres.

Green infrastructure: reconciling urban green space and regional economic development: lessons learnt from experience in England's north-west region

What does good green and blue infrastructure policy look like: a comparative assessment of UK national planning guidance

Progressing Green Infrastructure planning: understanding its scalar, temporal, geo-spatial and disciplinary evolution

Biodiversity and the Recreational Value of Green Infrastructure in England

Green Infrastructure Planning in Metropolitan Regions to Improve the Connectivity of Agricultural Landscapes and Food Security

Access to Nature in a Post Covid-19 World: Opportunities for Green Infrastructure Financing, Distribution and Equitability in Urban Planning

A lack of focus on data sharing, stakeholders, and economic benefits in current global green infrastructure planning

Revisiting the concept, urban practices, current advances, and future prospects of green infrastructure

A bottom-up perspective on green infrastructure in informal settlements: Understanding nature's benefits through lived experiences

Urban centre green metrics in Great Britain: A geospatial and socioecological study

Enabling Urban Social Farming: the need for radical green infrastructure in the city

Could green infrastructure supplement ecosystem service provision from semi-natural grasslands?

Using green infrastructure to improve urban air quality (GI4AQ)

A Multiple Scale, Function, and Type Approach to Determine and Improve Green Infrastructure of Urban Watersheds

How do green innovations promote regional green total factor productivity? Multidimensional analysis of heterogeneity, spatiality and nonlinearity

Integrating green infrastructures in spatial planning: a scrutiny of regional tools in Sardinia, Italy

Relationships between health outcomes in older populations and urban green infrastructure size, quality and proximity

Capturing residents' perceptions of green spaces in densifying urban landscapes - the potentials of mental mapping.

‘Greening’ Green Infrastructure. Good Italian Practices for Enhancing Green Infrastructure through the Common Agricultural Policy

From landscapes of utopia to the margins of the green urban life

Looking beyond boundaries: Revisiting the rural-urban interface of Green Space Accessibility in Europe