Abstract:Purpose This paper seeks to explore one particular aspect of recent PA research: the apparently widening gap between top academic research and practitioner concerns. This topic was commissioned by the Editor of IJPSM . Evidence of this sliding away from the “real world” is presented. The reasons for it are discussed including Q1 increased measurement, competition and professionalization within academia. Whilst these trends bring significant benefits, a case can nevertheless be made for re-balancing PA research. The purpose of this paper Q2 is to sketch some ways of approaching these trends. Design/methodology/approach This paper was commissioned by the editor. The author has chosen to examine the often-cited gap between academic research and current practitioner concerns. The author has done this using as the author’s main evidence base all the main articles published by the highest impact journals over the years 2015 and 2016. Findings Over the past 30 years more and more of the PA research published in the highest impact journals has become further and further removed from the immediate concerns of practicing administrators and managers. At the same time publication in these journals has become more salient for academic careers. Research limitations/implications Whilst the identified trends bring significant benefits (in terms of increasing professionalization and methodological sophistication) they also carry negative consequences for the historically important dialogue between academics and practitioners. A case can be made for attempting to re-balance PA research. Some ways of approaching this are sketched. Practical implications The academic practitioner dialogue, which, historically, has been vital for academic PA, is currently under some stress. Professionalization and competition within the academic world seem to have widened the gap between the top journals and the “real world.” A case is made that the PA academic community needs to find ways of giving this issue more systematic discussion. Originality/value If the argument is largely correct, then current trends threaten the future of academic PA research. This paper is not the first to identify this threat, but it is one of the first to give it extended consideration and systematically to consider possible causes and remedies.

Theories and Theorizing in Public Administration: A Systematic Review

Appraising the philosophical influences on modern public administration research

Public Administration at the Millennium: The State of the Field

Networks, Management and Institutions: Public Administration as 'Normal Science'

Theorising Interdisciplinary Public Sector Accounting Research

Notes on Contemporary Public Administration Theories in the West

The Scope and Trends of Public Administration Publications from Selected Journals Between the Year 2000 and 2019

The Evolution of Social Network Analysis in Public Administration

Comparative Studies in Public Administration: Intellectual Challenges and Alternative Perspectives

Public administration research since 1980: slipping away from the real world?

Assessing Qualitative Studies in Public Administration Research

Reflections on “Public Administrative Theory and the Separation of Powers”

A Review of Public Administration Research: Where Does Public Procurement Fit In?

Integrating Philosophical Perspectives into the Study of Public Administration: the Contribution of Critical Realism to Understanding Public Value

A Paradigmatic View of Contemporary Public Administration Research: An Empirical Test

Without Blinders: Public Values Scholarship in Political Science, Economics, and Law—Content and Contribution to Public Administration

Network Effects Research: A Systematic Review of Theoretical Mechanisms and Measures

The Public Deciding Force of Administrative Action and Impairment of Public Affairs

A Systematic Review of Field Experiments in Public Administration

The future of public administration research: An editor's perspective

The Study of Public Administration