Developing Automated Computer Algorithms to Phenotype Periodontal Disease Diagnoses in Electronic Dental Records
Jay Sureshbhai Patel,Ryan Brandon,Marisol Tellez,Jasim M. Albandar,Rishi Rao,Joachim Krois,Huanmei Wu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1757880
IF: 1.8
2022-11-23
Methods of Information in Medicine
Abstract:Objective Our objective was to phenotype periodontal disease (PD) diagnoses from three different sections (diagnosis codes, clinical notes, and periodontal charting) of the electronic dental records (EDR) by developing two automated computer algorithms. Methods We conducted a retrospective study using EDR data of patients ( n = 27,138) who received care at Temple University Maurice H. Kornberg School of Dentistry from January 1, 2017 to August 31, 2021. We determined the completeness of patient demographics, periodontal charting, and PD diagnoses information in the EDR. Next, we developed two automated computer algorithms to automatically diagnose patients' PD statuses from clinical notes and periodontal charting data. Last, we phenotyped PD diagnoses using automated computer algorithms and reported the improved completeness of diagnosis. Results The completeness of PD diagnosis from the EDR was as follows: periodontal diagnosis codes 36% ( n = 9,834), diagnoses in clinical notes 18% ( n = 4,867), and charting information 80% ( n = 21,710). After phenotyping, the completeness of PD diagnoses improved to 100%. Eleven percent of patients had healthy periodontium, 43% were with gingivitis, 3% with stage I, 36% with stage II, and 7% with stage III/IV periodontitis. Conclusions We successfully developed, tested, and deployed two automated algorithms on big EDR datasets to improve the completeness of PD diagnoses. After phenotyping, EDR provided 100% completeness of PD diagnoses of 27,138 unique patients for research purposes. This approach is recommended for use in other large databases for the evaluation of their EDR data quality and for phenotyping PD diagnoses and other relevant variables. This study was reviewed and approved by our institutional review board (IRB: 28321) granted authorization. In this retrospective study, we used deidentified patient datasets from the patients' EDR records; therefore, informed consents were not required to obtain. Received: 26 February 2022 Accepted: 30 August 2022 Article published online: 22 November 2022 © 2022. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) Georg Thieme Verlag KG Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
health care sciences & services,computer science, information systems,medical informatics