Abstract:Philosophers of science have argued that epistemic diversity is an asset for the production of scientific knowledge, guarding against the effects of biases, among other advantages. The growing privatization of scientific research, on the contrary, has raised important concerns for philosophers of science, especially with respect to the growing sources of biases in research that it seems to promote. Recently, Holman and Bruner (2017) have shown, using a modified version of Zollman (2010) social network model, that an industrial selection bias can emerge in a scientific community, without corrupting any individual scientist, if the community is epistemically diverse. In this paper, we examine the strength of industrial selection using a reinforcement learning model, which simulates the process of industrial decision-making when allocating funding to scientific projects. Contrary to Holman and Bruner's model, in which the probability of success of the agents when performing an action is given a priori, in our model the industry learns about the success rate of individual scientists and updates the probability of success on each round. The results of our simulations show that even without previous knowledge of the probability of success of an individual scientist, the industry is still able to disrupt scientific consensus. In fact, the more epistemically diverse the scientific community, the easier it is for the industry to move scientific consensus to the opposite conclusion. Interestingly, our model also shows that having a random funding agent seems to effectively counteract industrial selection bias. Accordingly, we consider the random allocation of funding for research projects as a strategy to counteract industrial selection bias, avoiding commercial exploitation of epistemically diverse communities.

Epistemic Inclusion as the Key to Benefiting from Cognitive Diversity in Science

Virtual diversity: Resolving the tension between the wider culture and the institution of science

Open Science and Epistemic Diversity: Friends or Foes?

Epistemic diversity and industrial selection bias

Epistemic Diversity and the Question of Lingua Franca in Science and Philosophy

Epistemic Diversity and Epistemic Advantage: A Comparison of Two Causal Theories in Feminist Epistemology

Epistemic exclusion: A theory for understanding racism in faculty research evaluations.

A Dynamical Systems Description of Privilege, Power and Leadership in Academia: identifying barriers and paths to inclusive communities of excellent scholarship

A Diverse View of Science to Catalyse Change.

Diversity of contributions is not efficient but is essential for science

Authenticity and exclusion: social media algorithms and the dynamics of belonging in epistemic communities

The Promises and Realities of Integration in Synthetic Biology: A View From Social Science

Catalyzing Equity in STEM Teams: Harnessing Generative AI for Inclusion and Diversity

The Diversity-Innovation Paradox in Science

Uncharted Territory: Delving into Unexplored Knowledge to Curb Ableism in Academia

Interdisciplinary collaboration from diverse science teams can produce significant outcomes

Science Communication Demands a Critical Approach That Centers Inclusion, Equity, and Intersectionality

Make Scientific Conferences More Inclusive by Increasing Transparency in Speaker Selection

A Rising Tide Lifts All Boats? The Model of Differentiation As a Tool for Diversity in Science toward Social Inclusion

Increasing diversity in conference speaker programmes

What is Worth Knowing? Science, Knowledge, and Gendered and Indigenous Knowledge-Systems