Abstract:Anthropomorphic design is a common method in brand building,marketing communication or product design,such as being used for the brand mascot.Generally speaking,anthropomorphic design in marketing can increase perceived intimacy,purchase intention or product evaluation,among others.However,there was insufficient attention in research on the possible negative effects of anthropomorphism.Focusing on food advertisements,this study tried to identify the mechanism of inappropriate anthropomorphic design in advertisement,which may lead to consumers' negative emotional response and attitude toward advertisement.We conducted three experiments to investigate this speculation.The data of Study 1 was collected from 80 undergraduates.Participants in Group 1 saw the anthropomorphic advertisement while Group 2 saw a non-anthropomorphic advertisement,following which both groups responded to questionnaire items on the manipulation check of anthropomorphism,attitude toward advertisement and guilt.Study 2 and 3 further investigated the boundary effect of the authenticity of humanity.Study 2 manipulated authenticity by anthropomorphizing different objects in the advertisement.Participants in Study 3 were presented with different sets of science material on plant,which influenced their perception of humanity authenticity.The data of Study 2 and 3 were collected from 135 and 105 undergraduates.Our experiments showed that inappropriate anthropomorphic design in food advertisement generated illusions of "eating people",and made consumers feel guilty.Guilt is a kind of self-conscious emotion,which involves negative feelings about a specific behavior or action taken by the self.So,anthropomorphic design in food makes "eating" a hurtful behavior,which subsequently makes consumers feel guilty.The results showed that the negative effects of anthropomorphic design on attitude towards advertisement were mediated by the guilty feeling.Furthermore,this effect only happened when perceived humanity authenticity of food anthropomorphic design was high.When consumers did not believe the anthropomorphized object had the ability to think (authenticity of food anthropomorphic design is low),then it would not lower the positive attitude towards the advertisement.As a result,the negative effect would only happen when pigs but not when meat balls were anthropomorphized (Study 2),and when participants read materials indicating that even mushroom could feel the pain (Study 3).This study filled the gap of the negative influence of anthropomorphic design by exploring the mechanism of negative emotion (guilt) and authenticity.Furthermore,past research usually focused on companies or marketing materials,however,this study focused on the view of consumers' wellbeing.The studies provide important implications for food advertising.

Fear or humor? The effects of negatively framed visual hyperbole in advertising

The influence of humor in advertising: Explaining the effects of humor in two‐sided messsages

Using Different Advertising Humor Appeals To Generate Firm-Level Warmth And Competence Impressions

Aesthetics-based mystery in advertising: the roles of consumers’ high-end product perceptions and the construal level of ad words

Unmasking the pivotal role of ad–target ethnic congruence in driving consumers' response to fear appeals

Gender Roles and Humor in Advertising: The Occurrence of Stereotyping in Humorous and Nonhumorous Advertising and Its Consequences for Advertising Effectiveness

The role of threat-based awe and construal level in charitable advertising

When verbal metaphors become more persuasive: the interplay between goal orientation of ad claims and metaphor

The interactive effects of moral identity and humor on advertising evaluations: the mediating role of disgust

Green With Fear: Fear Appeals and Temporal Framing in Eco-Friendly Clothing Advertising

Negative Outcomes, Threats and Threat Appeals: Widening the Conceptual Framework for the Study of Fear and Other Emotions in Social Marketing Communications

When Are Loss Frames More Effective in Climate Change Communication? An Application of Fear Appeal Theory

Offensive or amusing? The study on the influence of brand-to-brand teasing on consumer engagement behavioral intention based on social media

The role of hyperbole in conveying emotionality: the case of victim speech

To gain face or not to lose face: the effect of face message frame on response to public service advertisements

Negative Emotion Effects of Anthropomorphic Advertising: Mediating Role of Guilt

WHAT HAPPENS AFTER THEY LAUGH: HOW HUMOROUS ADVERTISEMENTS HAVE AN EFFECT ON CONSUMERS’ ATTITUDES, WORD OF MOUTH INTENTIONS, AND PURCHASE INTENTIONS, WITH THE NEED FOR HUMOR PLAYING A MODERATING ROLE

Appealing to fear: A meta-analysis of fear appeal effectiveness and theories.

Effects of Visual Metaphors on Enhancing the Power of Advertisements

Why does advertising work? exploring the neural mechanism of concreteness and emotional effects of donation advertising slogans

Masking the Offense? An Ethical View on Humor in Advertising