Abstract:Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety, Volume 15, Issue , January-December 2024. Background:Hypovolemia is common in colonoscopy due to fasting and bowel preparation, and propofol itself can reduce systemic vascular resistance, resulting in relative hypovolemia. Therefore, hypotension is not a rare event during propofol-based sedation for colonoscopy.Objectives:Our objective was to explore the efficacy of esketamine as a sedative adjuvant in reducing the incidence of hypotension during colonoscopy.Design:This was a prospective randomized trial. The trial was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ID: ChiCTR 2100047032).Methods:We included 100 eligible patients who planned to receive a colonoscopy and randomly divided them into 4 groups with 25 patients in each group, which were propofol 2 mg/kg (Group P), propofol 1 mg/kg with esketamine 0.2 mg/kg (Group E1), propofol 1 mg/kg with esketamine 0.3 mg/kg (Group E2), and propofol 1 mg/kg with esketamine 0.4 mg/kg (Group E3). The hemodynamic and respiratory parameters were documented at various times during the procedure, including the patient's entry into the endoscopic room (T0), the induction of sedation (T1), the insertion of the colonoscope (T2), the removal of the colonoscope (T3), and the awakening of the patient (T4). The primary outcome was the incidence of hypotension. Secondary outcomes were cardiovascular side effects other than hypotension, incidence of hypoxia, cumulative changes in cardiovascular and respiratory parameters, total propofol dosage, anesthesia recovery time, and satisfactory levels of both patients and endoscopists.Results:The incidence of hypotension in Group E1 (16%), Group E2 (16%), and Group E3 (12%) was significantly lower than in Group P (60%), with p values 0.003, 0.003, and <0.001 respectively. The cumulative changes in diastolic blood pressure and mean arterial pressure in Groups E1, E2, and E3 were significantly higher than in Group P (p = 0.024, p < 0.001, p = 0.006, respectively). Cumulative changes in systolic blood pressure in Group E3 were significantly higher than those in Group P (p = 0.012). The respiratory-related parameters were not statistically significant.Conclusions:This study showed that the application of 0.4 mg/kg esketamine in propofol-based sedation reduced the incidence of hypotension during colonoscopy while providing satisfactory sedation.Plain language summaryImpact of different doses of esketamine on incidence of hypotension in propofol-based sedation for colonoscopyBackground:When people undergo colonoscopy and are sedated with propofol, about one-third of them experience low blood pressure. This study aims to see if adding esketamine to the propofol can help prevent or lessen these episodes of low blood pressure during colonoscopy.Methods:This study examined four groups who received different doses of esketamine along with propofol. It focuses on differences in the occurrence of low blood pressure, respiratory measures, the amount of anesthetic used, and levels of satisfaction. The study analyzed the relevant data for these parameters to understand the differences between the groups.Results:The results indicated that using esketamine along with propofol for sedation during colonoscopy led to several key outcomes, such as:• Three different concentrations of esketamine effectively reduced the occurrence of low blood pressure in patients undergoing colonoscopy.• Less propofol was needed in the groups that included esketamine.• Esketamine at a dosage of 0.4 mg kg-1 showed the best respiratory parameters among the four groupsConclusions:During colonoscopy, using esketamine along with propofol for sedation not only achieves satisfactory sedation but also lowers the occurrence of hypotension. Specifically, employing 0.4 mg kg-1 esketamine along with propofol not only reduces hypotension occurrences but also enhances respiration.

Comparison of propofol-esketamine versus propofol for anesthesia in gastroscopy: a double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial

The effectiveness of esketamine and propofol versus dezocine and propofol sedation during gastroscopy: A randomized controlled study

Efficacy and safety of subanesthetic doses of esketamine combined with propofol in painless gastrointestinal endoscopy: a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial

Propofol Alone Versus Propofol in Combination with Remifentanil or Ketamine for Analgesia during Gastroscopy and Colonoscopy.

Comparison of 95% Effective Dose of Remimazolam Besylate and Propofol for Gastroscopy Sedation on Older Patients: A Single‐centre Randomized Controlled Trial

The median effective concentration of propofol with different doses of esketamine during gastrointestinal endoscopy in elderly patients: A randomized controlled trial

Sedation and Safety of Propofol for Therapeutic Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography.

Efficacy and Safety of Propofol combined with different doses of Remifentanil for gastroscopy: A-randomized controlled trial

Optimizing sedation in gastroscopy: a study on the etomidate/propofol mixture ratio

Impact of different doses of esketamine on the incidence of hypotension in propofol-based sedation for colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial

Remimazolam versus propofol in combination with esketamine for surgical abortion: A double-blind randomized controlled trial

Effect of a subanesthetic dose of esketamine combined with propofol on postoperative fatigue syndrome in patients undergoing gastroenterological endoscopy under anaesthesia: A retrospective study

Comparison of remimazolam and propofol combined with low dose esketamine for pediatric same-day painless bidirectional endoscopy: a randomized, controlled clinical trial

Comparison of the Efficacy of HSK3486 and Propofol for Induction of General Anesthesia in Adults: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled, Phase 3 Noninferiority Trial

Efficacy and safety of low-dose esketamine for painless gastrointestinal endoscopy in adults: a systematic evaluation and meta-analysis

Comparison of the effects of esketamine, sufentanil, or lidocaine combined with propofol on tussis reflection during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: study protocol for a randomised, two centre, three-blind, controlled trial

Comparative efficacy and safety of ciprofol, propofol, and propofol and etomidate mixture, and ciprofol and etomidate mixture in patients undergoing painless gastroscopy: A randomized, double-blind controlled clinical trial

Comparison Between Esketamine and Alfentanil for Hysteroscopy: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial

Effects of opioid-free propofol or remimazolam balanced anesthesia on hypoxemia incidence in patients with obesity during gastrointestinal endoscopy: A prospective, randomized clinical trial

Efficacy and Safety of the Remimazolam-Alfentanil Combination for Sedation During Gastroscopy: A Randomized, Double-blind, Single-center Controlled Trial

Etomidate Versus Propofol for Monitored Anesthesia Care During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial