The effectiveness of esketamine and propofol versus dezocine and propofol sedation during gastroscopy: A randomized controlled study

Yafei Xu,Yuling Zheng,Tianying Tang,Lvlv Chen,Yiwen Zhang,Zhongqi Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpt.13678
2022-04-30
Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics
Abstract:This is a flow diagram showing enrollment of participants. A total of 102 patients were enrolled in this study from October to November 2021, 15 patients were excluded, and 87 patients were randomly assigned to receive esketamine or dezocine, but 83 patients completed the study finally (esketamine group n = 42, dezocine group n = 41).What Is Known and ObjectivePropofol is widely used in painless gastroscopy. However, sedation with propofol alone might increase the risk of respiratory and circulatory complications. This randomized clinical study compares the efficacy and safety of esketamine or dezocine combined with intravenous (IV) propofol in patients undergoing gastroscopy.MethodsA total of 102 patients were enrolled in this study and randomized into two groups. All patients were adults aged 18–64 years who underwent upper gastrointestinal gastroscopy. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups to receive esketamine (0.3 mg/kg) combined with propofol (group E) or dezocine (0.05 mg/kg) combined with propofol (group D). In both groups, the drugs were administered intravenously. The primary outcome was the dose of propofol which provided a satisfactory sedative effect, both to the endoscopist and the patients. Secondary outcomes included recovery time, side effects (such as hypotension, nausea and vomiting and agitation), and the number of adverse circulatory and respiratory events.ResultsData of 83 patients were analysed in the present study. Dosage of propofol required in group E (1.44 mg/kg ± 0.67 mg/kg) was significantly lower compared with that in group D (2.12 mg/kg ± 0.37 mg/kg) (p
pharmacology & pharmacy
What problem does this paper attempt to address?