Comparative analysis of clinical treatment outcomes: Breath‐hold vs. free‐breathing techniques in liver stereotactic body radiotherapy

Kosuke Morishima,Hideomi Yamashita,Tomoyuki Noyama,Atsuto Katano
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1754-9485.13793
2024-10-22
Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology
Abstract:Introduction The aim of this study was to clarify the safety and efficacy of breath‐hold irradiation in liver stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 57 consecutive patients who received SBRT for hepatocellular carcinoma or liver metastases between 2013 and 2021. Breath‐hold irradiation was implemented for patients treated after April 2020. Results The median follow‐up period for all patients was 16.4 months (IQR: 7.36–20.9). The 2‐year overall survival rate was 64.4% (95% CI: 47.4–77.2), and the local control rate was 84.3% (95% CI: 69.7–92.3) for all patients. The 1‐year overall survival was 80.0% (95% CI: 60.8–90.5) versus 82.0% (95% CI: 53.5–93.9) in the free‐respiratory (FR) group versus the breath‐hold (BH) group, respectively (P = 0.60). The 1‐year local control rates were 78.1% (95% CI: 57.5–89.5) in the FR group and 95.7% (95% CI: 72.9–99.4) in the BH group, respectively (P = 0.16). Radiation‐induced liver injury, defined by an escalation of ≥2 in Child–Pugh score, was observed in four patients within each group (FR 13% vs. BH 15%). There were no gastrointestinal adverse events of Grade 3 or higher. Conclusion Breath‐hold irradiation can be safely administered and has demonstrated clinical potential in improving local control. Further research into dose escalation using breath‐hold techniques is warranted.
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
What problem does this paper attempt to address?