Multihoming vs. Single-Homing Software: Compatibility or Competition?

Shidao Geng,Jingpei Ma,Cong Wang,Feng Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.3043644
IF: 3.9
2021-01-01
IEEE Access
Abstract:Compatibility or competition is a key strategic decision for multihoming software developers. Compatibility is a strategy by which companies set up their software to be more compatible with their competitors' products, while competition is an opposite strategy by which the companies set up their software without any compatibility. We study the strategic decision of a multihoming software company that competes with two firms on different operating systems, (such as Windows and Mac). By formalizing a game-theoretic model to capture the motivation of a multihoming software developer, we find that the compatibility strategy is mainly incentivized by the trade-off between the spillover effect and the compatibility cost. We then solve for reasonable software prices and compatibility level given the market potential from the software firms' perspective. Several managerial guidelines are obtained to determine the optimal decision in the software development economy. Interestingly, when both the spillover effect and the compatibility cost are low enough, the multihoming software firm still chooses the competing strategy. Finally, by reporting the numerical analysis, we verify the effectiveness of the theoretical results derived in our model.
computer science, information systems,telecommunications,engineering, electrical & electronic
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper attempts to address the issue of whether multihoming software should choose a compatibility strategy when competing with single-homing software on different operating systems. Specifically, the paper explores how a multihoming software company decides whether its product should be compatible with a competitor's product in a market environment with two different operating systems, and how this decision impacts software pricing strategies and company profits. The paper analyzes the motivations of a multihoming software company to choose a compatibility strategy or a competitive strategy when facing competition from two single-homing software companies by constructing a game theory model. The model considers the trade-off between the spillover effect of compatibility and the cost of compatibility. The study finds that when the spillover effect is low and the compatibility cost is sufficiently high, a multihoming software company may still choose a competitive strategy. Additionally, the paper explores the choice between a single-homing strategy in the traditional operating system market and a multihoming strategy in the emerging operating system market for established companies. In summary, the paper aims to explain the rational basis for a multihoming software company to choose a compatibility strategy and analyze how this strategy affects software pricing strategies and changes in company profits.