Abstract:With two-sided platforms becoming an increasingly ubiquitous business model, quality is a vital factor for the success of high-technology platforms that face fierce competition. To maintain competency, high-technology platforms commonly use two quality regulation strategies: the exclusion strategy (E strategy), in which the platform denies access to low-quality complementors, and the subsidization strategy (S strategy), in which the platform provides a fixed subsidy to high-quality complementors. This paper investigates the optimal quality regulation strategy for platforms in a duopoly setting. We examine and compare three scenarios: (i) both platforms adopt the exclusion strategy, i.e. mode EE, (ii) both platforms adopt the subsidization strategy, i.e. mode SS, and (ii) one platform adopts the subsidization strategy while the other adopts the exclusion strategy, i.e. mode SE. First, we find that although the developer network size is larger and the platforms charge developers higher access fees under SS, the average quality and the consumer access fees are lower under SS than under EE, leading to lower profits for platforms. Second, under SE, in comparison with the platform that adopts the exclusion strategy, the platform that uses the subsidization strategy achieves lower average quality and larger network sizes on both sides but may set higher or lower access fees on both sides. Moreover, the platform under the subsidization strategy profits more (less) when the operation cost on the developer side is high (low). Third, asymmetric mode SE does not necessarily induce moderate outcomes for market participants compared to modes EE and SS. We also examine the equilibrium mode by considering platforms’ optimal strategies for quality regulation. Our analyses reveal that as the operation cost on the developer side increases, the equilibrium mode evolves from EE to SE/ES and then to SS. These results and insights are robust to several alternative assumptions.

Competitive Analysis of Freemium Strategy of Duopoly Software Firms Based on Hotelling Model

Analysis of Freemium Business Model Considering Network Externalities and Consumer Uncertainty

Research on Pricing of Duopoly Competition Platform and Quality Strategy of Free Product in Bilateral Market

Network Externalities, Software Business Models and the Market Structure of Operation System Markets: A Comparative Research of Windows and Linux

Pricing strategies for information products with network effects and complementary services in a duopolistic market

Study of the horizontal competition of dual-channel retailer and traditional retailer with congestion negative effect of physical channel

Pricing of Shared-Parking Lot: an Application of Hotelling Model

EXPRESS: Exclusion or Subsidization? A Competitive Analysis of Quality Regulation Strategy for Two-sided Platforms

Study of the Competition of Location and Pricing between Two Supply Chains Each Consisting of One Manufacture and One Retailer

A model of monopoly e-marketplaces with interand intra-group externalities in two-sided markets

A Hotelling Model on Interchange Fees of Payment Card Compared to Commodities' Alliance

Strategic Decisions of a Multi-Product Firm under Bertrand Competition

Study on The application of The Hotelling Model in The Strategic Marketing Competition Between Meituan and Ele.me

Trial and Pricing Strategies of Software Market with Competition and Network Effects.

Optimal Dynamic Pricing in the Presence of Network Externalities of the Duopolistic Marketing

Impact of User Skills and Network Effects on the Competition Between Open Source and Proprietary Software

Strategic promotion decisions of competing mobile application suppliers in Stackelberg game context

Optimal Pricing Mechanisms for Mobile Service Providers Under Duopoly Competition

Optimal software pricing strategy with foresighted buyers

Open to Your Rival: Competition between Open Source and Proprietary Software under Indirect Network Effects

Differentiation competition of network goods, market equilibrium and price discrimination