Abstract:Sea-level rise due to climate change will have significant effects on coastal areas and populations. Adaptation policies recommend the managed realignment of the most vulnerable assets and activities. Despite their medium- and long-term benefits, these policies face significant friction due to social acceptability in the communities where they are implemented. This article investigates the hypothesis that respecting principles of justice in the implementation of managed realignment should increase its acceptability. We compare preferences of those people who are exposed to the risk of climate-change-induced flooding and those who are not, as regards funding managed retreat policies and defining compensation criteria for assets at risk. The main theories of social justice provide the four principles included in the analysis: efficiency, need, responsibility and priority assigned to property rights. A choice experiment survey was conducted with 258 residents of coastal and hinterland communities in the south of France. Four attributes were selected to define the managed realignment policy: the dialogue arrangements, the implementation period, the policy implementation schedule and the cost. The results show support for a relatively fast launch of these policies (within 15 years) but in stages and through a process of dialogue with the population. People's perceptions of the funding criteria reveal a preference for national solidarity. Finally, national funding of managed retreat policies and compensation criteria based on market prices have a significant positive influence on the acceptability of managed realignment policies, whereas introducing responsibility-based compensation criteria tends to favour the status quo over the adaptation policy. Policy relevance Prioritization of the funding criteria reveals the preference for national solidarity. Preferences for the justice criteria underpinning compensation reveal a great diversity of values. Besides implantation modalities, preferences for managed realignment policies depend on which level they are implemented at, on the expropriation criteria (the emphasis given to property rights, i.e. market price), on the attachment (people perceived as worst off, i.e. the property is their main residence rather than a second home or they have lower levels of income) and on the degree of responsibility (related to the date of purchase, i.e. on the information given at the time on the risk).

How environmental beliefs influence the acceptance of reallocating government budgets to improving coastal water quality: a hybrid choice model

Preserve or retreat? Willingness-to-pay for Coastline Protection in New South Wales

A behavioural measure of environmental decision-making for social surveys

Partial attribute attendance in environmental choice experiments: A comparative case study between Guangzhou (China) and Brussels (Belgium)

Comparative Analysis of Visual Amenity Services Valuation: A Nationwide Assessment Through Propensity Scoring Matching and Hedonic Regression

Hybrid choice modeling offers an interdisciplinary perspective on angler preferences for the future

An alternative aggregate preference ranking algorithm to assess environmental effects on macrobenthic abundance in coastal water

Boosting beach clean-up participation through community resilience hypothetical scenarios

Impact of justice and solidarity variables on the acceptability of managed realignment

Investigating revealed preferences for urban waterway conditions: A hedonic property valuation study

Using the Health Belief Model to Explore the Impact of Environmental Empathy on Behavioral Intentions to Protect Ocean Health

The effect of risk perception on public preferences and willingness to pay for reductions in the health risks posed by toxic cyanobacterial blooms

Best Practices for Using Hedonic Property Value Models to Measure Willingness to Pay for Environmental Quality

Paying to save the beach: effects of local finance decisions on coastal management

Parallel Subjective Well-Being and Choice Experiment Evaluation of Ecosystem Services: Marine and Forest Reserves in Coastal Oregon, USA

Importance-performance dynamics and willingness to pay in coastal areas for climate-adaptive marine debris management

Who should benefit from environmental policies? Social preferences and nonmarket values for the distribution of environmental improvements

On the impact of decision rule assumptions in experimental designs on preference recovery: An application to climate change adaptation measures

Investing in Nature: Assessing the Effects of Monetary and Non-Monetary Valuations on Decision-Making

Environmental Awareness and Public Support for Protecting and Restoring Puget Sound

Homeowner mitigation decision‐making: Exploring the theory of planned behaviour approach