Abstract:Householders are increasingly responsible for managing residual flood risk at property level. Yet, consumers are observed to adopt irrational behaviors under scenarios of risk, often making suboptimal decisions. Therefore, the question is raised, if householders are required to manage flood risk at household level, how can this be made fair and efficient? Policy instruments often incorporate "fairness" by subsidizing the costs of mitigation options, assuming a linear relationship between available finances and the uptake of risk mitigation measures. To integrate behavior into the assessment of policy instruments, this article develops a method to compare the uptake of flood mitigation between agents following models of Expected Monetary Value (EMV) and Prospect Theory (PT). An agent-based model is created, offering the option to apply either EMV or PT frameworks. EMV represents a rational gamble, determining whether an agent "should" invest in insurance or property-level protection. On the other hand, the PT option incorporates behavioral aspects to examine how agents are likely to respond to investment decisions in flood risk environments. The models are applied to Flood Re, a policy aimed at ensuring affordable insurance access for all individuals in flood risk areas. The results demonstrate that PT models exhibit greater similarity to observed behavior compared to models based on EMV. These findings emphasize the importance of accommodating "irrational" behaviors within the design of policy instruments, promoting fairness and efficiency. Overall, this research provides insights into the integration of behavior in policy assessments and highlights the benefits of considering PT frameworks alongside traditional rational models. By understanding and accounting for human behavior in decision-making processes, policymakers can design more effective and equitable policy instruments for managing flood risk.

Homeowner mitigation decision‐making: Exploring the theory of planned behaviour approach

Adoption of Individual Flood Damage Mitigation Measures in New York City: An Extension of Protection Motivation Theory

Understanding the effects of past flood events and perceived and estimated flood risks on individuals' voluntary flood insurance purchase behavior

Attitudes toward moving or staying and buying flood insurance to face varied flood threats in a floodplain community

Hope, optimism, and self-efficacy predicting mental health and illness in a community sample exposed to Hurricane Harvey

Participation in the Community Rating System of NFIP: an Empirical Analysis of North Carolina Counties

Drivers of natural disaster risk‐reduction actions and their temporal dynamics: Insights from surveys during an imminent hurricane threat and its aftermath

The determinants affecting the intention of urban residents to prepare for flood risk in China

Integrating irrational behavior into flood risk models to test the outcomes of policy interventions

The determinants affecting the intention of urban residents to prevent flooding in China

How Flood Experience and Risk Perception Influences Protective Actions and Behaviours among Canadian Homeowners

Why near-miss events can decrease an individual's protective response to hurricanes

Uncertainty in Flood Mitigation Practices: Assessing the Economic Benefits of Property Acquisition and Elevation in Flood-Prone Communities

Outreach Programs, Peer Pressure, and Common Sense: What Motivates Homeowners to Mitigate Wildfire Risk?

Factors of influence on flood risk perceptions related to Hurricane Dorian: an assessment of heuristics, time dynamics, and accuracy of risk perceptions

Damage versus risk perception: Why do house prices recover after hurricanes?

Insights into the complementarity of natural disaster insurance purchases and risk reduction behavior

Unpacking Protection Motivation Theory: evidence for a separate protective and non-protective route in private flood mitigation behavior

Factors Influencing Public Participation in Community Disaster Mitigation Activities: A Comparison of Model and Nonmodel Disaster Mitigation Communities

Insights into the Effects of Cognitive Factors and Risk Attitudes on Fire Risk Mitigation Behavior