Abstract:Flooding exacerbated by climate change has resulted in more mandatory community participation in the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). The purpose of this research is social regulatory floodplain criteria that may have an impact on various socioeconomic factors at the county and sub-county level. Updated mapping can result in widespread changes to the NFIP Special Flood Hazard Area, while no socioeconomic vulnerability assessments are completed before changes in risk designation or subsidy elimination occurs. These changes can result in additional compulsory flood insurance policies, heightened policy costs, and ultimately produce socioeconomic barriers for lower-income residents. The objectives include demonstrating the potential nationwide implications of increasing community risk with these changes to national policy through a case study from Ada County, Idaho where FEMA began updating the floodplain maps in 2015. Ada County was chosen for being reflective of other communities that may be suffering similar impacts from NFIP policy. A sequential explanatory mixed-methods approach was employed using semi-structured interviews, spatial analysis, and the Spatially Explicit Resilience-Vulnerability (SERV) model to assess potential community impacts. Results indicate increased vulnerability in the revised floodplain. Total annual sales volume, employee numbers, industry sectors, and overall community vulnerability are higher in the revised floodplain. Interviews with community leaders corroborated these results. This case study provides a foundation for further research on the impacts of flood insurance on communities across the USA while discussing the social injustice of a national program that is likely promoting the upward distribution of wealth county by county.

Syringoma‐like sweat duct proliferation in scalp alopecias

Barriers to Insurance as a Flood Risk Management Tool: Evidence from a Survey of Property Owners

Understanding Flood Risk Perception: A Case Study from Canada

Public Attitudes Toward Policy Instruments for Flood Risk Management

Nephelometric method for determination of rheumatoid factor.

Attitudes toward moving or staying and buying flood insurance to face varied flood threats in a floodplain community

Evaluating property buyouts and disaster recovery assistance (Rebuild) options in Canada: A comparative analysis of Constance Bay, Ontario and Pointe Gatineau, Quebec

On the horns of a dilemma: Experts as communicators for property‐level flood risk adaptation measures

Participation in the Community Rating System of NFIP: an Empirical Analysis of North Carolina Counties

Insights into the complementarity of natural disaster insurance purchases and risk reduction behavior

RECENT RESEARCH ON RED SQUILL AS A RODENTICIDE

Untangling the myth of flood risk and mitigation in affluent inland urban neighbourhood – A case study of the Onion Creek Neighbourhood in austin, Texas

Exploring the link between flood risk perception and public support for funding on flood mitigation policies

An Exploration of the Good Death

Disaster Awareness and Preparedness Among Older Adults in Canada Regarding Floods, Wildfires, and Earthquakes

Flood Disaster Risk Perception and Urban Households’ Flood Disaster Preparedness: The Case of Accra Metropolis in Ghana

Problems of obtaining information on accidental ingestions and poisoning incidents.

Socioeconomic implications of national flood insurance policy reform and flood insurance rate map revisions

Changes in female sexual behavior of old female rats: comparison between exit method and non-exit method.

Signaling thresholds and interclonal competition in preimmune B‐cell selection

Divergent Residential Pathways from Flood-Prone Areas: How Neighborhood Inequalities Are Shaping Urban Climate Adaptation