Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To develop and evaluate scaling and scoring assumptions, and the reliability and the validity of a Chinese version of the SF-36 scales.METHODS:A multi-stage mixed sampling procedure was used to select a representative sample of the general population. The sample size was 1 000 households. All family members of a selected household, aged 18 and older, completed a survey by self-administration. Formal psychometric methods for testing assumptions underlying item scoring and scale construction were used according to the standard procedure of the IQOLA Project.RESULTS:Of the 1 985 collected questionnaires, 1 972 were qualified. Of them, 1 688 (85.6%) were respondents. 1 316 respondents answered all 36 items, while the remaining (372 respondents) answered with one or several missing responses. Among the non-respondents, 65.5% were illiteracy or quasi-illiteracy. The assumption of equal intervals was violated for the VT and MH scales. The recoded item values were used to calculate scale scores. The clustering and ordering of the item means were approximately the same as that of the source version and other two Chinese versions. The items in each scale had similar standard deviations except those in the PF, BP, SF scales. The correlations between an item and its hypothesized scale were identical for all except the SF and VT scales. The scaling success rates of convergent validity were 0% for the SF scale, 75% for the VT scale, and 100% for the other six scales. The scaling success rates of discriminat validity ranged from 87.5% to 100% for all scales except for the SF scale. The Cronbach' alpha coefficients of internal consistency reliability ranged from 0.72 to 0.88, which were satisfactory for group comparison except 0.39 for the SF scale and 0.66 for the VT scale. The two-weeks test-retest reliability coefficient ranged from 0.66 to 0.94. Factor analysis identified two principal components: a "physical" factor and a "mental" factor. Taken together, these two factors could be used to explain 56.3% of the total variance.CONCLUSION:The Chinese version of the SF-36 Health Survey Scale has achieved conceptual equivalence and satisfied the psychometric scaling assumptions well enough to warrant wide use in China. Known-groups validity will give more meaningful evidences of the validity of the Chinese SF-36 scales.

The Super-Short Form of Career Adapt-Abilities Scale: Cross-Cultural Validation in China and the United Kingdom

Psychometric properties of the Career Adapt-Abilities Scale–Short Form: evidence from Chinese elite athletes

A Preliminary Study on Self-constructionals Scales (scs)of Chinese-Version

Psychometric Testing of the Chinese Version of the Coping and Adaptation Processing Scale-Short Form in Adults with Chronic Illness

Social Support, Social Comparison, and Career Adaptability: A Moderated Mediation Model

Career Adapt-Abilities Scale: Reliability Generalization Meta-Analysis

The Validity of CAAS Scores in Divergent Social Occupations

Development and validation of a career adaptability scale for Chinese normal students from the perspective of the coupling of supply and demand

Development and Psychometric Tests of a Chinese Version of the SF-36 Health Survey Scales.

A Psychometric Evaluation of the Career Decision Self-Efficacy Scale-Short Form in Chinese High School Students

Career Insecurity Scale Short Form (CI-S): Construction and Validation

Adaptation and validation of the university-to-work success scale among Chinese university graduates

Validation of the Family-Supportive Coworker Behavior Scale in the Chinese Context

Reliability and Vaiidatioa of the Social Comparison Orientation Scale

Work Volition Scale for Chinese Working Adults: A Cross-Cultural Validation Study

Development and validation of the Career-related Teacher Support Scale: data from China

Measuring career shocks: A study of scale development and validation in the Chinese context

Reliability and validity of the short version of the childhood abuse self report scale in Chinese college students

Predictive Validity of Career Decision-Making Profiles Over Time Among Chinese College Students

The Reliability and Validity of a Chinese Version of the College Students' Career Maturity Inventory

Competitive Psychological Climate in China: Scale Development and Validation