Abstract:Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog. As global biodiversity is rapidly declining due to habitat loss, it is important to determine how to protect it. The policies of many conservation agencies are still prioritizing the preservation of a single large habitat area (SL) versus several small areas of the same size (SS), despite empirical support favouring SS. However, to date, while many studies have explored this issue using model communities, the results are mixed. In competitive community models, fragmentation has a negative effect at low habitat amounts, whereas neutral community models suggest positive effects. This work aims to explore spatial multispecies models to verify the SS > SL pattern and determine its causes. We used three types of models: a classical neutral, neutral with habitat selection and a competitive hierarchical model. All models have three parameters, namely extinction, reproduction and dispersal distance. In the classical neutral model, species are equivalent and have the same parameters; when there is a reproduction event, they send the propagule to a surrounding patch blindly, and if the patch is already occupied, the propagule dies. In the neutral with habitat selection model, the propagules select an empty patch, so their survival is ensured. In the hierarchical model, species have competitive dominance and more dominant ones can replace the less dominant with a replacement rate parameter. We use 100 species and start simulating the colonization of an empty area; then, we destroy a fixed amount of habitat using different regular patch sizes. The results for all models are almost always that SS retains more species than SL. The extinction of species in patches depends on the quotient between reproduction and extinction rates in relation to patch size. The only case when SL > SS is when dispersal is insufficient to connect patches, and patch size is smaller than the minimum to prevent extinction. If patch size is above the critical size to maintain local populations, the SS > SL pattern is due to the sampling effect of aggregated species distribution combined with the reduction of dispersal ability of species. High‐dispersal rates produce the homogenization of species distribution and a reduction of species richness and this is why habitat fragmentation by habitat loss retains more species when patches are smaller. The model predicts that if a set of species have more dispersal capabilities, the SS effect would be lower than for species with less dispersal. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Mean landscape‐scale incidence of species in discrete habitats is patch size dependent

Why there are more species in several small patches versus few large patches: A multispecies modelling approach

Habitat amount, not patch size and isolation, drives species richness of macro‐moth communities in countryside landscapes

Habitat Fragmentation Affects Richness—A View Through a Metacommunity Lens

What determines the spatial extent of landscape effects on species?

Assessing Habitat Fragmentation’s Hierarchical Effects on Species Diversity at Multiple Scales: the Case of Thousand Island Lake, China

SLOSS‐based Inferences in a Fragmented Landscape Depend on Fragment Area and Species–area Slope

Inflammatory cytokine gene polymorphisms increase the risk of atrophic gastritis and intestinal metaplasia.

The Effects of Landscape Variables on the Species-Area Relationship During Late-Stage Habitat Fragmentation.

The Asymmetric Relationships of the Distribution of Conspecific Saplings and Adults in Forest Fragments

Decoupling Species Richness Variation and Spatial Turnover in Beta Diversity Across a Fragmented Landscape

The Distribution Of Plants And Seed Dispersers In Response To Habitat Fragmentation In An Artificial Island Archipelago

Spatial extent predicts Andean epiphyte biodiversity responses to habitat loss and fragmentation across human‐modified landscapes

Landscape context affects patch habitat contributions to biodiversity in agroecosystems

The scale of effect of landscape context varies with the species’ response variable measured

Neighborhood Landscape Context Shapes Local Species Richness Patterns Across Continents

How much information is there in arthropod data about the landscape around sampling sites? Exploring a theory based on site-specificity of organisms

Can local landscape attributes explain species richness patterns at macroecological scales?

Suppurative granulomatous inflammation in the ileo-anal pouch.

Environmental range per unit space determines a unimodal pattern of species richness along a heterogeneity gradient

The Resolution‐dependent Role of Landscape Attributes in Shaping Macro‐scale Biodiversity Patterns