Abstract:Our work shows how nonlinear responses to environmental gradients drive many of the relationships between plant biodiversity and the biodiversity of above‐ and below‐ground biological communities. This demonstrates how different aspects of biodiversity might respond nonlinearly to changing environments and identifies cases where management‐induced changes in one community could either influence other taxa or lead to loss of apparent biological associations. To predict how biodiversity will respond to global change, it is crucial to understand the relative roles of abiotic drivers and biotic interactions in driving associations between the biodiversity of disparate taxa. It is particularly challenging to understand diversity–diversity links across domains and habitats, because data are rarely available for multiple above‐ and below‐ground taxa across multiple sites. Here, we analyse data from a unique biodiversity data set gathered across a variety of oceanic temperate terrestrial habitats in Wales, comprising 300 sites with co‐located soil microbial, plant, bird and pollinator surveys along with climate and soil physicochemical information. Soil groups are analysed using metabarcoding of the 16S, ITS1 and 18S DNA regions, allowing in‐depth characterisation of microbial and soil animal biodiversity. We explore biodiversity relationships along three aspects of community composition: First, we assess correlation between the alpha diversity of different groups. Second, we assess whether biotic turnover between sites is correlated across different groups. Finally, we investigate the co‐occurrence of individual taxa across sites. In each analysis, we assess the contribution of linear or nonlinear environmental effects. We find that a positive correlation between alpha diversity of plants, soil bacteria, soil fungi, soil heterotrophic protists, bees and butterflies is in fact driven by complex nonlinear responses to abiotic drivers. In contrast, environmental variation did not account for positive associations between the diversity of plants and both birds and AM fungi, suggesting a role for biotic interactions. Both the diversity and taxon‐level associations between the differing soil groups remained even after accounting for nonlinear environmental gradients. Above‐ground, spatial factors played larger roles in driving biotic communities, while linear environmental gradients were sufficient to explain many group‐ and taxon‐level relationships. Synthesis. Our results show how nonlinear responses to environmental gradients drive many of the relationships between plant biodiversity and the biodiversity of above‐ and below‐ground biological communities. Our work shows how different aspects of biodiversity might respond nonlinearly to changing environments and identifies cases where management‐induced changes in one community could either influence other taxa or lead to loss of apparent biological associations.

Scale-specific correlations between habitat heterogeneity and soil fauna diversity along a landscape structure gradient

Environmental heterogeneity at two spatial scales affects litter diversity–decomposition relationships

Soil textural heterogeneity impacts bacterial but not fungal diversity

A diversity of diversities: Do complex environmental effects underpin associations between below‐ and above‐ground taxa?

The Habitat Type and Scale Dependences of Interspecific Associations in a Subtropical Evergreen Broad-Leaved Forest

Soil heterogeneity and plant species diversity in experimental grassland communities: contrasting effects of soil nutrients and pH at different spatial scales

Light heterogeneity affects understory plant species richness in temperate forests supporting the heterogeneity–diversity hypothesis

Plant diversity is associated with the amount and spatial structure of soil heterogeneity in meadow steppe of China

Heterogeneity-diversity relationships differ between and within trophic levels in temperate forests

Functional Diversity Versus Species Diversity: Relationships with Habitat Heterogeneity at Multiple Scales in A Subtropical Evergreen Broad-Leaved Forest

Context specific effects of substrate composition on the taxonomic and functional diversity of macroinvertebrate communities in temperate lowland streams

Fine-scale habitat differentiation shapes the composition, structure and aboveground biomass but not species richness of a tropical Atlantic forest

Relative importance of tree species richness, tree functional type, and microenvironment for soil macrofauna communities in European forests

Environmental Heterogeneity As a Driver of Terrestrial Biodiversity on a Global Scale

Publisher Correction: Heterogeneity Within and among Co-Occurring Foundation Species Increases Biodiversity

Cross‐scale scaling‐law analyses for the heterogeneity and diversity of animal gut microbiomes from community to landscape

Intraspecific Variability and Species Turnover Drive Variations in Collembola Body Size along a Temperate-Boreal Elevation Gradient

Scale-dependent diversity-biomass relationships can be driven by tree mycorrhizal association and soil fertility

Effects of local and landscape factors on paddy field arthropod diversity: from species to communities

Evaluating the Impact of Long-Term Land Use Change and Age since Disturbance on Soil Faunal Diversity

Community-aggregated plant traits interact with soil nutrient heterogeneity to determine ecosystem functioning