Countering sex and gender bias in cardiovascular research requires more than equal recruitment and sex disaggregated analyses

Carolina Rau Steuernagel,Carolyn S P Lam,Trisha Greenhalgh
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2023-075031
2023-08-30
The BMJ
Abstract:The US Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial in the 1970s screened 325 348 men and no women for risk of cardiovascular disease; 12 866 of these men were identified as high risk and offered prevention strategies.1 Dozens of publications resulted, producing a robust evidence base on cardiovascular risk and prevention—in white men.1 Tellingly, the trial's acronym was "Mr Fit."This flagrant sex and ethnic bias was part of a wider pattern. The Physicians Health Study, which established the efficacy of aspirin for prevention of myocardial infarction,2 and various cardiovascular prevention studies that ran till the mid-1990s were limited to white men.34 Indeed, in the second half of the 20th century, women in childbearing years were routinely excluded from medical research trials on the grounds that their hormone cycles made study populations too heterogeneous,5 and to avoid a repeat of the thalidomide tragedy in which an experimental drug proved teratogenic.6 Yet cardiovascular...
medicine, general & internal
What problem does this paper attempt to address?