Differentiating electrocardiographic indications of massive and submassive pulmonary embolism: A cross‐sectional study in Southern Iran from 2015 to 2020

Zahra Bahreini,Maliheh Kamali,Fatemeh Kheshty,Hamed Bazrafshan Drissi,Shahrokh Sadeghi Boogar,Mehdi Bazrafshan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.24252
2024-03-13
Clinical Cardiology
Abstract:Differentiating massive or submassive pulmonary embolism (PE) using electrocardiogram (ECG), can help physicians with better management. In this study 250 patients with definite diagnosis of PE were selected and ECG finding were compared. It was shown that inverted T wave in leads V1–V3 and troponin levels were the best tools. Background Although using electrocardiogram (ECG) for pulmonary embolism (PE) risk stratification has shown mixed results, it is currently used as supplementary evidence in risk stratification. This cross‐sectional study aimed to assess and compare ECG findings of massive and submassive PE versus segmental PE. Methods This cross‐sectional study included 250 hospitalized patients with a confirmed diagnosis of acute PE from 2015 to 2020 in Southern Iran. Demographic variables, clinical data, troponin levels, on‐admission ECG findings, echocardiography findings, and ECG findings 24 h after receiving anticoagulants or thrombolytics were extracted. Results Patients diagnosed with submassive or massive PE exhibited significantly higher rates of right axis deviation (p = .010), abnormal ST segment (p
cardiac & cardiovascular systems
What problem does this paper attempt to address?