Secure Messaging and Telephone Use for Clinician-to-Clinician Communication

Sunny S. Lou,Daphne Lew,Laura R. Baratta,Elise Eiden,Christine A. Sinsky,Thomas Kannampallil

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.17781

2024-06-21

JAMA Network Open

Abstract:This cohort study investigates the association of use of text-based secured messaging with telephone use among resident physicians.

medicine, general & internal

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Secure Messaging Use and Wrong-Patient Ordering Errors by Inpatient Clinicians

Sunny S. Lou,Daphne Lew,Linlin Xia,Laura Baratta,Elise Eiden,Thomas Kannampallil

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.47797

2024-12-06

JAMA Network Open

Abstract:This cohort study uses electronic health record data to investigate the association between hospital clinician use of secure messaging and wrong-patient ordering errors.

medicine, general & internal
Academic hospitalist perspectives on the benefits and challenges of secure messaging: A mixed methods analysis

Michelle Knees,Angela Keniston,Amy Yu,Matthew Sakumoto,Sara Westergaard,Natalie Schwatka,Rachel Peterson,Aveena Kochar,Andrew Auerbach,Tiffany Lee,Marisha Burden

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.13522

2024-10-02

Abstract:Background: Hospitals and patients rely on effective clinician communication. Asynchronous electronic secure messaging (SM) systems are a common way for hospitalists to communicate, but few studies have evaluated how hospitalists are navigating the adoption of SM and the benefits and challenges they are encountering. Objectives: The objective of this study is to assess academic hospitalist perspectives on SM to guide future research and quality improvement initiatives. Methods: This was a mixed methods study utilizing an embedded REDCap survey and six virtual semistructured focus groups. It took place during a Hospital Medicine ReEngineering Network Zoom meeting on October 13, 2023. Rapid qualitative methods were used to define major themes. Results: There were 28 hospitalists and one patient representative across 24 separate academic institutions. There was a 71% survey completion rate (N = 20). SM was felt to be an effective and efficient communication modality but was associated with a large amount of multitasking and interruptions. Perspectives around SM clustered around three main themes: SM has been widely but variably adopted; there is a lack of institutional guidance about how to best engage with SM; and SM is changing the landscape of hospitalist work by increasing ease but decreasing depth of communication, increasing cognitive load, and changing interpersonal relationships. Recommendations for SM improvements included the need for institutions to work with frontline workers to develop and implement clear usage guidelines. Conclusion: SM is likely contributing to both positive and negative effects for clinicians and patients. Understanding hospitalist perspectives on SM will help guide future research and quality improvement initiatives.
Evaluation of Secure Messaging Applications for a Health Care System: A Case Study

Xinran Liu,Paul R Sutton,Rory McKenna,Mika N Sinanan,B Jane Fellner,Michael G Leu,Cris Ewell

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1678607

Abstract:Objective: The use of text messaging in clinical care has become ubiquitous. Due to security and privacy concerns, many hospital systems are evaluating secure text messaging applications. This paper highlights our evaluation process, and offers an overview of secure messaging functionalities, as well as a framework for how to evaluate such applications. Methods: Application functionalities were gathered through literature review, Web sites, speaking with representatives, demonstrations, and use cases. Based on similar levels of functionalities, vendors were grouped into three tiers. Essential and secondary functionalities for our health system were defined to help narrow our vendor choices. Results: We stratified 19 secure messaging vendors into three tiers: basic secure communication, secure communication within an existing clinical application, and dedicated communication and collaboration systems. Our essential requirements revolved around functionalities to enhance security and communication, while advanced functionalities were mostly considered secondary. We then narrowed our list of 19 vendors to four, then created clinical use cases to rank the final vendors. Discussion: When evaluating a secure messaging application, numerous factors must be considered in parallel. These include: what clinical processes to improve, archiving text messages, mobile device management, bring your own device policy, and Wi-Fi architecture. Conclusion: Secure messaging applications provide a Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) compliant communication platform, and also include functionality to improve clinical collaboration and workflow. We hope that our evaluation framework can be used by other health systems to find a secure messaging application that meets their needs.
Pediatric Clinical Staff Perspectives on Secure Messaging

Katherine E. Taylor Pearson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ncq.0000000000000775

2024-08-24

Journal of Nursing Care Quality

Abstract:Secure messaging (SM) is a communication feature within a patient portal that allows patients and clinical staff to exchange health-related information securely and confidentially.

nursing
Look Who's Talking: Application of a Theory-Based Taxonomy to Patient-Clinician E-mail Messages

Dawn M Heisey-Grove,Jonathan P DeShazo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2019.0192

Abstract:Background: Patient-clinician communication between office visits may improve patient outcomes by increasing patients' information retention and offering opportunities for patient-centered communication. Secure electronic messaging offers one such communication modality, but evidence of associations between its use and patient outcomes is mixed. To date, no study has examined the relationship between message content and patient outcomes. Introduction: Secure message content provides context around patients' requests and whether clinicians responded in ways that improve care and outcomes. This study evaluates the use of a theory-based taxonomy to classify patients' and clinicians' message content and describes characteristics associated with coded content. Methods: We coded message threads initiated in 2017 by 73 randomly selected patients with hypertension and/or diabetes. Multiple codes could be applied to each message. Chi-square analyses identified differences by patients' demographics and health condition. Results: We analyzed 658 message threads composed of 1,751 clinician- and patient-generated messages, to which 2,055 taxonomic codes were assigned. Eighteen percent of patients' threads were unanswered. Most codes assigned to patient-generated messages were task-oriented (46%) or information seeking (26%) requests; 30% of clinician responses left those requests unfulfilled or unaddressed. Clinicians were more likely to recommend a patient be seen in the office based on patients' sex, age, and health condition. Furthermore, white patients were more likely to send, and receive from their clinicians, messages with praise and appreciation content compared with black patients. Conclusion: Further research is needed to better understand how and why these differences exist so that patient-clinician electronic messaging is optimized to improve patient outcomes.
Enhancing Doctor-Patient Communication: An Exploratory Study

Marcus Alphin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.62470/5b241389

2023-06-01

Abstract:Effective communication is crucial in healthcare, yet patients often experience confusion and dissatisfaction due to the complexity and inaccessibility of medical information. This research addresses the critical need for clear and continuous communication between patients and healthcare providers, both within and beyond the clinical setting. Recognizing that the doctor-patient relationship is foundational to successful healthcare outcomes, this research works on DocTalk, a proposed digital platform designed to enhance this interaction. DocTalk can offer a secure, integrated communication system that not only facilitates patient understanding and involvement in their own care but also enables seamless coordination among multiple healthcare providers. This becomes particularly vital when patients are dealing with multiple medical professionals, where miscommunication can lead to inadequate or erroneous treatment. By leveraging the advancements in wireless technology and messaging, DocTalk aims to streamline the traditional methods like texting and phone calls, thus the communication process in healthcare can be simpler and securer. This paper analyses DocTalk’s potential to improve healthcare procedures and outcomes, focusing on its role in enhancing patient-doctor communication and its impact on various health outcomes using mobile databases. The research underscores the importance of accessible and effective communication in healthcare.
Use of Instant Messaging Software in a German Hospital-An Exploratory Investigation among Physicians

Sabine Sayegh-Jodehl,Rebecca Mukowski-Kickhöfel,Diane Linke,Claudia Müller-Birn,Matthias Rose

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912618

2022-10-02

Abstract:Internationally, evidence exists that physicians use instant messaging services for communication tasks in everyday clinical practice However, there are only few data on physicians in Germany in this regard. Therefore, at the initiation of our project "DocTalk-Dialog meets Chatbot: Collaborative Learning and Teaching in the Process of Work", we conducted a stakeholder survey with an exploratory research approach. The aim was to gain initial insights into use of instant messaging software and attitudes towards data security and advantages and disadvantages before implementing a data-secure in-house messaging platform. N = 70 physicians at Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin completed an exploratory questionnaire with closed and open-ended questions. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and qualitative data using thematic analysis. The use of messenger software was not widespread in the sample studied. Physicians most frequently used face-to-face contact for communication. On average, up to ten instant messages were exchanged per day, mainly among colleagues, to answer mutual questions, and to send pictures. With a high awareness of privacy-related restrictions among participating physicians, advantages such as fast and uncomplicated communication were also highlighted. An instant messenger solution that complies with the German data protection guidelines is needed and should be investigated in more detail.
Mobile Text Messaging for Tobacco Risk Communication among Young Adult Community College Students: Randomized Trial of Project Debunk

Alexander Prokhorov,Karen Sue Calabro,Ashish Arya,Sophia Russell,Katarzyna W. Czerniak,Gabrielle C. Botello,Minxing Chen,Ying Yuan,Adriana Perez,Damon J. Vidrine,Cheryl L. Perry,Georges Elias Khalil

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/25618

2021-01-01

JMIR mhealth and uhealth

Abstract:Background: The use of new and emerging tobacco products (NETPs) and conventional tobacco products (CTPs) has been linked to several alarming medical conditions among young adults (YAs). Considering that 96% of YAs own mobile phones, SMS text messaging may be an effective strategy for tobacco risk communication. Objective: Project Debunk is a community-based randomized trial aiming to identify specific types of messages that effectively improve perceived NETP and CTP risk among YAs in community colleges. Methods: With YAs recruited offline from 3 campuses at the Houston Community College (September 2016 to July 2017), we conducted a 6-month randomized trial with 8 arms based on the combination of 3 message categories: framing (gain-framed vs loss-framed), depth (simple vs complex), and appeal (emotional vs rational). Participants received fully automated web-based SMS text messages in two 30-day campaigns (2 messages per day). We conducted repeated-measures mixed-effect models stratified by message type received, predicting perceived CTP and NETP risks. Owing to multiple testing with 7 models, an association was deemed significant for P<.007 (.05 divided by 7). Results: A total of 636 participants completed the baseline survey, were randomized to 1 of 8 conditions (between 73 and 86 participants per condition), and received messages from both campaigns. By the 2-month post campaign 2 assessment point, 70.1% (446/636) completed all outcome measures. By the end of both campaigns, participants had a significant increase in perceived NETP risk over time (P<.001); however, participants had a marginal increase in perceived CTP risk (P=.008). Separately for each group, there was a significant increase in perceived NETP risk among participants who received rational messages (P=.005), those who received emotional messages (P=.006), those who received simple messages (P=.003), and those who received gain-framed messages (P=.003). Conclusions: In this trial, YAs had an increase in perceived NETP risk. However, with stratification, we observed a significant increase in perceived NETP risk upon exposure to rational, emotional, simple, and gain-framed messages. In addition, YAs generally had an increase in perceived CTP risk and presented nonsignificant but observable improvement upon exposure to emotional, complex, and loss-framed messages. With the results of this study, researchers and practitioners implementing mobile health programs may take advantage of our tailored messages through larger technology-based programs such as smartphone apps and social media campaigns. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03457480; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03457480 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): RR2-10.2196/10977
Patient-Provider Text Messaging and Video Calling Among Case-Managed Patients Living With HIV: Formative Acceptability and Feasibility Study

Virginia A Fonner,Samuel Kennedy,Rohan Desai,Christie Eichberg,Lisa Martin,Eric G Meissner

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/22513

2021-05-27

JMIR Formative Research

Abstract:Background Patient-provider communication is critical for engaging and retaining people living with HIV in care, especially among medically case-managed patients in need of service coordination and adherence support. Expanding patient-provider communication channels to include mobile health modalities, such as text messaging and video calling, has the potential to facilitate communication and ultimately improve clinical outcomes. However, the implementation of these communication modalities in clinical settings has not been well characterized. Objective The purpose of this study is to understand patient and provider perspectives on the acceptability of and preferences for using text messaging and video calling as a means of communication; perceived factors relevant to adoption, appropriateness, and feasibility; and organizational perspectives on implementation within an HIV clinic in South Carolina. Methods We conducted 26 semistructured in-depth interviews among patients receiving case management services (n=12) and clinic providers (n=14) using interview guides and content analysis informed by the Proctor taxonomy of implementation outcomes and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Participants were purposefully sampled to obtain maximum variation in terms of age and gender for patients and clinic roles for providers. The data were analyzed using quantitative and qualitative content analyses. Results Most patients (11/12, 92%) and providers (12/14, 86%) agreed that they should have the capacity to text message and/or video call each other. Although consensus was not reached, most preferred using a secure messaging app rather than standard text messaging because of the enhanced security features. Perceived benefits to adoption included the added convenience of text messaging, and potential barriers included the cost and access of smartphone-based technology for patients. From an organizational perspective, some providers were concerned that offering text messaging could lead to unreasonable expectations of instant access and increased workload. Conclusions Patients and providers perceived text messaging and video calling as acceptable, appropriate, and feasible and felt that these expanded modes of communication could help meet patients’ needs while being safe and not excessively burdensome. Although patients and providers mostly agreed on implementation barriers and facilitators, several differences emerged. Taking both perspectives into account when using implementation frameworks is critical for expanding mobile health–based communication, especially as implementation requires active participation from providers and patients.
Text messaging to support off-campus clinical nursing facilitators: a descriptive survey

Christine Howard,Amanda R Fox,Fiona Coyer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2013.12.011

Abstract:Background: Managing large student cohorts can be a challenge for university academics, coordinating these units. Bachelor of Nursing programmes have the added challenge of managing multiple groups of students and clinical facilitators whilst completing clinical placement. Clear, time efficient and effective communication between coordinating academics and clinical facilitators is needed to ensure consistency between student and teaching groups and prompt management of emerging issues. Methods: This study used a descriptive survey to explore the use of text messaging via a mobile phone, sent from coordinating academics to off-campus clinical facilitators, as an approach to providing direction and support. Results: The response rate was 47.8% (n=22). Correlations were found between the approachability of the coordinating academic and clinical facilitator perception that, a) the coordinating academic understood issues on clinical placement (r=0.785, p<0.001), and b) being part of the teaching team (r=0.768, p<0.001). Analysis of responses to qualitative questions revealed three themes: connection, approachability and collaboration. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that use of regular text messages improves communication between coordinating academics and clinical facilitators. Findings suggest improved connection, approachability and collaboration between the coordinating academic and clinical facilitation staff.
Demographics and clinical features associated with rates of electronic message utilization in the primary care setting

Michael A. Hansen,Jacqueline Hirth,Roger Zoorob,James R. Langabeer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4562220

IF: 4.73

2024-01-12

International Journal of Medical Informatics

Abstract:Introduction Electronic messages are growing as an important form of patient-provider communication, particularly in the primary care setting. However, adoption of healthcare technology has been under-utilized by underserved patient populations. The purpose of this study was to describe how adoption and utilization of electronic messaging occurred within a large primary care urban-based patient population. Methods In this retrospective study, the frequency of electronic messages initiated by adult outpatient primary care patients was observed. Patients were classified as either non-portal adopters, non-message utilizers, low message utilizers, and high message utilizers. Logistic regression modeling was used to compare factors associated with message utilization rates to determine disparities in access. Results Among a sample of 27,453 ethnically diverse adult patients from the Houston, Texas Metropolitan area, 33,497 unique messages were sent (1.22 messages/patient). Message burden was predominantly derived by a small number of high utilizers (individuals who sent 3 or more messages), who comprised 15.7 % of the study population (n = 4302) but accounted for 77 % of the message volume (n = 25,776). These high utilizers were typically older, White, English speaking, from middle to upper income zip codes, had higher number of comorbidities, and a higher number of clinical visits. Conclusions Most inbox messages were generated by a small number of patients. While it was reassuring to see older and sicker individuals utilizing electronic messaging, patients from minority and/or lower income background utilized electronic messaging much less. This may propagate systematic bias and decrease the level of care for traditionally underserved patients.

health care sciences & services,computer science, information systems,medical informatics
Digital mobile technology facilitates HIPAA-sensitive perioperative messaging, improves physician-patient communication, and streamlines patient care

Chad R. Gordon,Kameron S. Rezzadeh,Andrew Li,Andrew Vardanian,Jonathan Zelken,Jamie T. Shores,Justin M. Sacks,Andres L. Segovia,Reza Jarrahy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13037-015-0070-9

2015-05-23

Patient Safety in Surgery

Abstract:BackgroundMobile device technology has revolutionized interpersonal communication, but the application of this technology to the physician-patient relationship remains limited due to concerns over patient confidentiality and the security of digital information. Nevertheless, there is a continued focus on improving communication between doctors and patients in all fields of medicine as a means of improving patient care. In this study, we implement a novel communications platform to demonstrate that instantaneously sharing perioperative information with surgical patients and members of their support networks can improve patient care and strengthen the physician-patient relationship.Methods423 consecutive patients scheduled to undergo elective surgical procedures were offered complimentary registration to a secure, web-based service designed to distribute perioperative updates to a group of recipients designated by each patient via Short Message Service (SMS) and/or email. Messages were created by attending surgeons and delivered instantaneously through the web-based platform. In the postoperative period, patients and their designated message recipients, as well as participating healthcare providers, were asked to complete a survey designed to assess their experience with the messaging system. Survey results were statistically analyzed to determine satisfaction rates.ResultsOf the qualifying 423 patients, 313 opted to enroll in the study. On average, patients selected a total of 3.5 recipients to receive perioperative updates. A total of 1,195 electronic messages were generated for distribution to designated recipients during the study period and delivered to recipients located around the world. There were no documented errors or failures in message delivery. Satisfaction surveys were completed by 190 users of the service (73 %). Respondents identified themselves as either patients (n = 48, 25.5 %), family/friends (n = 120, 63.8 %), or healthcare providers (n = 15, 12 %). Satisfaction with the service was high: 94.2 % of users “enjoyed this software” and and 94.2 % of family/friends “felt more connected to their loved ones during surgery.” 92.5 % would “recommend their loved ones sign up for this service". Ninety percent of patients who completed the survey reported “an improved hospital experience”ConclusionDigital communications platforms can facilitate the immediate transfer of HIPAA-compliant data to patients and their designees. Such systems can greatly improve the level of communication between physicians, patients, and patients’ families and caregivers. All types of users, including healthcare professionals, patients, and their loved ones, recorded high levels of satisfaction. Based on these observations, we conclude that mobile digital communications platforms represent a way to harness the power of social media to enhance patient care.
Efficiency Paradox: Introducing Secure Messaging in Outpatient Care

Maura Soekijad

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117578

IF: 5.379

2024-12-02

Social Science & Medicine

Abstract:This study explores the uptake of secure messaging technology and the influence it has on the work of three interconnected occupational roles. It was executed in an outpatient clinic, where the administrative staff adopted the new secure messaging tool, expecting it to improve efficiency. The study found that the efficiency-enhancing tool over time introduced new inefficiencies into the work of administrative assistants, nurses, and physicians, and this phenomenon is noted as the efficiency paradox , which is examined and explained throughout the study. This research contributes to health information technology and role reconfiguration literature by highlighting the crucial role of emotions in this emergent and relational process and discussing the implications of that in the context of patient-provider communication.

public, environmental & occupational health,social sciences, biomedical
Patient Use of Email, Facebook, and Physician Websites to Communicate with Physicians: A National Online Survey of Retail Pharmacy Users

Joy L Lee,Niteesh K Choudhry,Albert W Wu,Olga S Matlin,Troyen A Brennan,William H Shrank

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-015-3374-7

Abstract:Background: Patient-physician communication often occurs outside the clinic setting; many institutions discourage electronic communication outside of established electronic health record systems. Little empirical data are available on patient interest in electronic communication and Web-based health tools that are technically feasible but not widely available. Research objective: To explore patient behavior and interest in using the Internet to contact physicians. Design: National cross-sectional online survey. Participants: A sample of 4,510 CVS customers with at least one chronic condition in the household was used to target patients with chronic conditions and their caregivers. Subjects were identified from a national panel of over 100,000 retail pharmacy customers. Of those sampled, 2,252 responded (50.0 % response rate). Main measures: Survey measures included demographic and health information, patient use of email and Facebook to contact physicians, and patient interest in and use of Web-based tools for health. Key results: A total of 37 % of patients reported contacting their physicians via email within the last six months, and 18 % via Facebook. Older age was negatively associated with contacting physicians using email (OR 0.57 [95 % CI 0.41-0.78]) or Facebook (OR 0.28 [0.17-0.45]). Non-white race (OR 1.61 [1.18-2.18] and OR 1.82 [1.24-2.67]) and caregiver status (OR 1.58 [1.27-1.96] and OR 1.71 [1.31- 2.23]) were positively associated with using email and Facebook, respectively. Patients were interested in using Web-based tools to fill prescriptions, track their own health, and access health information (37-57 %), but few were currently doing so (4-8 %). Conclusions: In this population of retail pharmacy users, there is strong interest among patients in the use of email and Facebook to communicate with their physicians. The findings highlight the gap between patient interest for online communication and what physicians may currently provide. Improving and accelerating the adoption of secure Web messaging systems is a possible solution that addresses both institutional concerns and patient demand.
Are participants concerned about privacy and security when using short message service to report product adherence in a rectal microbicide trial?

Rebecca Giguere,William Brown,Ivan C Balán,Curtis Dolezal,Titcha Ho,Alan Sheinfil,Mobolaji Ibitoye,Javier R Lama,Ian McGowan,Ross D Cranston,Alex Carballo-Diéguez,William Brown III

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocx081

2017-08-24

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Abstract:Abstract Objective During a Phase 2 rectal microbicide trial, men who have sex with men and transgender women (n = 187) in 4 countries (Peru, South Africa, Thailand, United States) reported product use daily via short message service (SMS). To prevent disclosure of study participation, the SMS system program included privacy and security features. We evaluated participants’ perceptions of privacy while using the system and acceptability of privacy/security features. Materials and Methods To protect privacy, the SMS system: (1) confirmed participant availability before sending the study questions, (2) required a password, and (3) did not reveal product name or study participation. To ensure security, the system reminded participants to lock phone/delete messages. A computer-assisted self-interview (CASI), administered at the final visit, measured burden of privacy and security features and SMS privacy concerns. A subsample of 33 participants underwent an in-depth interview (IDI). Results Based on CASI, 85% had no privacy concerns; only 5% were very concerned. Most were not bothered by the need for a password (73%) or instructions to delete messages (82%). Based on IDI, reasons for low privacy concerns included sending SMS in private or feeling that texting would not draw attention. A few IDI participants found the password unnecessary and more than half did not delete messages. Discussion Most participants were not concerned that the SMS system would compromise their confidentiality. SMS privacy and security features were effective and not burdensome. Conclusion Short ID-related passwords, ambiguous language, and reminders to implement privacy and security-enhancing behaviors are recommended for SMS systems.

information science & library science,computer science, information systems, interdisciplinary applications,health care sciences & services,medical informatics
Automated Text Messages to Reduce Use of Acute Care After Hospital Discharge

Eric Bressman,Judith A. Long,Robert E. Burke,Aiden Ahn,Katherine Honig,Jarcy Zee,Nancy McGlaughlin,Mohan Balachandran,David A. Asch,Anna U. Morgan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.3701

2024-04-03

JAMA Network Open

Abstract:This randomized clinical trial examines the efficacy of an automated text messaging program to reduce acute health care resource utilization among primary care patients who have been discharged from an acute care hospitalization.

medicine, general & internal
Mobile data security: instant messaging in orthopaedics

Anna Ce McDonald,Alexandra Maling,Michael Puttick

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.17550

Abstract:Background: Instant messaging via WhatsApp is used within hospital teams. Group messaging can lead to efficient and non-hierarchical communication. Despite being end-to-end encrypted, WhatsApp is owned by Facebook, raising concerns regarding data security. The aims of this study were: (1) to record the prevalence of WhatsApp group instant messaging amongst clinical teams; (2) to ascertain clinician attitudes towards use of instant messaging and (3) to gauge clinicians' awareness of best practice regarding mobile data protection. Methods: Over a two-week period in May 2018, clinical nurse specialists in the Auckland District Health Board Orthopaedic department retrospectively collected data from all five team WhatsApp group message threads recording quantity of messages sent and the nature of the messages. Concurrently individuals in these WhatsApp groups completed an anonymous survey of their use of WhatsApp and their awareness of local data security policies and practice. Results: One thousand three hundred and sixty messages were sent via WhatsApp in a two-week period. 384 (28%) of the messages contained patient identifiable data. Thirty-six photos were shared. Participants rated use of WhatsApp at 9.1/10 - extremely beneficial. Sixty-five percent of clinicians reported they had not read or were unaware of the ADHB policies regarding mobile devices and information privacy and security. Conclusion: WhatsApp use is widespread within the Orthopaedic department and is the preferred platform of communication with many perceived benefits. Data security is a risk and implementation of appropriate guidelines to assist clinicians in achieving best practice is crucial to ensure patient data remains protected.
The feasibility and equity of text messaging to determine patient eligibility for lung cancer screening

Ilona Fridman,Lisa Carter-Bawa,Christine M Neslund-Dudas,Jennifer Elston Lafata

DOI: https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2024.89602

Abstract:Objectives: Text messaging could be effective for determining patient eligibility for lung cancer screening (LCS). We explored people's willingness to share their tobacco use history via text message among diverse groups. Study design: Cross-sectional survey. Methods: In 2020, we conducted a cross-sectional survey asking respondents about cellular phone usage, smoking habits, sociodemographic characteristics, and the likelihood of responding to a text message from their health care provider's office about tobacco use. We used χ² and analysis of variance tests for comparisons. Results: Among 745 respondents, 90% used text messaging casually. Overall, 54% never smoked, 33% currently smoked, and 13% previously smoked. Six percent were LCS eligible, and 20% used both cigarettes and e-cigarettes (dual users). Current smokers were significantly younger, less likely to be female, and more likely to use text messaging. LCS-eligible respondents were older and less likely to have a high income. Dual users were younger, less likely to report female gender and live in rural areas, and more likely to have a college education and high income. Most respondents (83%) indicated they were likely to respond to text message inquiries regarding smoking status. Middle-aged respondents (mean age, 37 years) were significantly more willing to report smoking status than younger or older respondents (91% vs 84% and 84%, respectively). Respondents with no college education (83% vs 88%) or with a low income vs a middle or high income (81% vs 86% and 88%, respectively) were significantly less willing to report smoking status via text messages. Conclusions: Text messaging showed promise for evaluating smoking history and for simplifying the process of identifying LCS-eligible individuals. However, achieving equity in identifying eligibility for LCS requires the implementation of multimodal strategies.
Navigating privacy and security in telemedicine for primary care

Katerina Andreadis,Kimberly A Muellers,Jenny J Lin,Rahma Mkuu,Carol R Horowitz,Rainu Kaushal,Jessica S Ancker

DOI: https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2024.89553

Abstract:Objective: To examine patient and provider perspectives on privacy and security considerations in telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic. Study design: Qualitative study with patients and providers from primary care practices in 3 National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network sites in New York, New York; North Carolina; and Florida. Methods: Semistructured interviews were conducted, audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and coded using an inductive process. Data related to privacy and information security were analyzed. Results: Sixty-five patients and 21 providers participated. Patients and providers faced technology-related security concerns as well as difficulties ensuring privacy in the transformed shared space of telemedicine. Patients expressed increased comfort doing telemedicine from home but often did not like their providers to offer virtual visits from outside an office setting. Providers initially struggled to find secure and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant platforms and devices to host the software. Whereas some patients preferred familiar platforms such as FaceTime, others recognized potential security concerns. Audio-only encounters sometimes raised patient concerns that they would not be able to confirm the identity of the provider. Conclusions: Telemedicine led to novel concerns about privacy because patients and providers were often at home or in public spaces, and they shared concerns about software and hardware security. In addition to technological safeguards, our study emphasizes the critical role of physical infrastructure in ensuring privacy and security. As telemedicine continues to evolve, it is important to address and mitigate concerns around privacy and security to ensure high-quality and safe delivery of care to patients in remote settings.
Clinician-patient E-mail communication: challenges for reimbursement

Eugenie M Komives

Abstract:Clinicians are rapidly gaining experience with online clinician-patient consultation, and more tools are becoming available to support these efforts. In addition, we now have evidence that using electronic communication is cost-effective to payers and appealing to patients and providers. At present, there appear to be few barriers to the adoption of these solutions for practices that use other online services. Security concerns can easily be overcome by using programs described in this commentary. Larger and longer studies that evaluate the benefits and cost savings in more detail may help convince other payers and providers of the utility of the Web-based programs. More studies are needed to understand the effect of dinician-patient electronic communication on the costs of caring for chronic illness. When these solutions also include support tools, such as electronic prescribing, which could improve patient safety and quality of care, they should be encouraged. In their article entitled, "Electrons in Flight-Email between Doctors and Patients," Delbanco and Sands postulate that the future of e-communication in medicine will be integrated with a patient-controlled health record and will include secure synchronous and asynchronous communication, video conferencing and messaging, instant transcription into the written record, full-patient access to the record, translation into different languages, connectivity to multiple data sources, incorporation of multi-media educational materials. It-will also allow data from home-based diagnostic technology to be sent to clinicians. "Electronic communication will move medicine inexorably toward such transparency, enabling doctors and patients to share knowledge, responsibility, and decision-making more equally. We need to explore rapidly how this change will affect the quality of care for patients and the quality of life for doctors." The widespread dependence on Internet-based electronic communication to support a variety of commercial, educational, and entertainment needs and interests offers us an opportunity to develop innovative approaches to some long-standing problems-assuring the accessibility of clinicians to their patients and the effectiveness and timeliness of communication between them. It is exciting that we now have well-documented examples of how these new technologies can be used to enhance the quality of primary care practice in both large and small practice organizations.

Secure Messaging and Telephone Use for Clinician-to-Clinician Communication

Secure Messaging Use and Wrong-Patient Ordering Errors by Inpatient Clinicians

Academic hospitalist perspectives on the benefits and challenges of secure messaging: A mixed methods analysis

Evaluation of Secure Messaging Applications for a Health Care System: A Case Study

Pediatric Clinical Staff Perspectives on Secure Messaging

Look Who's Talking: Application of a Theory-Based Taxonomy to Patient-Clinician E-mail Messages

Enhancing Doctor-Patient Communication: An Exploratory Study

Use of Instant Messaging Software in a German Hospital-An Exploratory Investigation among Physicians

Mobile Text Messaging for Tobacco Risk Communication among Young Adult Community College Students: Randomized Trial of Project Debunk

Patient-Provider Text Messaging and Video Calling Among Case-Managed Patients Living With HIV: Formative Acceptability and Feasibility Study

Text messaging to support off-campus clinical nursing facilitators: a descriptive survey

Demographics and clinical features associated with rates of electronic message utilization in the primary care setting

Digital mobile technology facilitates HIPAA-sensitive perioperative messaging, improves physician-patient communication, and streamlines patient care

Efficiency Paradox: Introducing Secure Messaging in Outpatient Care

Patient Use of Email, Facebook, and Physician Websites to Communicate with Physicians: A National Online Survey of Retail Pharmacy Users

Are participants concerned about privacy and security when using short message service to report product adherence in a rectal microbicide trial?

Automated Text Messages to Reduce Use of Acute Care After Hospital Discharge

Mobile data security: instant messaging in orthopaedics

The feasibility and equity of text messaging to determine patient eligibility for lung cancer screening

Navigating privacy and security in telemedicine for primary care

Clinician-patient E-mail communication: challenges for reimbursement