Abstract:Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the content and quality of videos about bruxism treatments on YouTube, a platform frequently used by patients today to obtain information. Methods: A YouTube search was performed using the keywords "bruxism treatment" and "teeth grinding treatment". "The sort by relevance" filter was used for both search terms and the first 150 videos were saved. A total of 139 videos that met the study criteria were included in the study. Videos were classified as poor, moderate or excellent based on a usefulness score that evaluated content quality. The modified DISCERN tool was also used to evaluate video quality. Additionally, videos were categorized according to the upload source, target audience and video type. The types of treatments mentioned in the videos and the demographic data of the videos were recorded. Results: According to the usefulness score, 59% of the videos were poor-quality, 36.7% were moderate-quality and 4.3% were excellent-quality. Moderate-quality videos had a higher interaction index than excellent-quality videos (p = 0.039). The video duration of excellent-quality videos was longer than that of moderate and poor-quality videos (p = 0.024, p = 0.002). Videos with poor-quality content were found to have significantly lower DISCERN scores than videos with moderate (p < 0.001) and excellent-quality content (p = 0.008). Additionally, there was a significantly positive and moderate (r = 0.446) relationship between DISCERN scores and content usefulness scores (p < 0.001). There was only a weak positive correlation between DISCERN scores and video length (r = 0.359; p < 0.001). The videos uploaded by physiotherapists had significantly higher views per day and viewing rate than videos uploaded by medical doctors (p = 0.037), university-hospital-institute (p = 0.024) and dentists (p = 0.006). The videos uploaded by physiotherapists had notably higher number of likes and number of comments than videos uploaded by medical doctors (p = 0.023; p = 0.009, respectively), university-hospital-institute (p = 0.003; p = 0.008, respectively) and dentists (p = 0.002; p = 0.002, respectively). Conclusions: Although the majority of videos on YouTube about bruxism treatments are produced by professionals, most of the videos contain limited information, which may lead patients to debate treatment methods. Health professionals should warn patients against this potentially misleading content and direct them to reliable sources.

Quality and Reliability of YouTube Video Contents About Sports Mouthguards: A Cross‐Sectional Study

Content quality and reliablity of YouTube™ videos as a source of information about good oral hygiene practices in adults

Evaluation of the reliability and accuracy of YouTubeTM and TikTokTM contents about storage media for avulsed teeth: A cross‐sectional study

Does YouTube Provide High-Quality Information for Patients Regarding Night Guards, Especially for Over-the-Counter Ones?

Bruxism treatment on Youtube: evaluating reliability and information accuracy

Evaluation of the Quality and Reliability of YouTubeTM Videos Created by Orthodontists as an Information Source for Clear Aligners

YouTube videos on gingival grafting procedures: Content and quality analysis

Orthodontic Elastics: A Multivariable Analysis of YouTubeTM Videos

Evaluation of Videos Related to Vaginal Cone Usage on YouTube as an Online Information Source

YouTube as an information source for bleeding gums: A quantitative and qualitative analysis

Analysis of YouTube videos as a source of information about dentin hypersensitivity

YouTube™ as a source of tooth avulsion information: A video analysis study

Orthodontic YouTube™ videos made by patients for patients: What are they about and are they accurate?

Evaluating the Reliability of YouTube as a Source of Information for Meniscal Ramp Lesions

Critical appraisal of YouTube videos regarding peri‐implant diseases and conditions: A cross‐sectional analysis

Is YouTube a Useful Source of Information on Pressure Injuries? A Content, Reliability, and Quality Analysis

YouTube as an information source for instrument separation in root canal treatment

Assessment of the Quality of Sinus Elevation with Lateral Window Approach Procedure Videos on YouTube: A Content-quality Analysis

How much information regarding gingival enlargement can we get from TikTok and YouTube?

Are social media platforms appropriate sources of information for patients regarding the topic of facial trauma?

Social Media Videos on Contraceptive Implants: An Assessment of Video Quality and Reliability