Are social media platforms appropriate sources of information for patients regarding the topic of facial trauma?

Sara Samur Erguven,Kubra Gulnur Topsakal
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2023.06.004
IF: 1.9
2023-06-16
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Abstract:Background Internet technologies have made a wide variety of information available to the public. Social media platforms can also be used as a source of information for patients seeking healthcare information. However, the quality of health information on social media platforms is not clear and standardized. Purpose To evaluate the content, reliability, and quality levels of videos reporting on facial trauma on a social media platform (YouTube TM ) regarding patients' information. Study design, setting, sample This was a cross-sectional study and the sample is composed of videos found on a social media platform based on searching the keyword "facial trauma". English-language videos with acceptable audiovisual quality and content related to facial trauma were included in the study. Predictor variables The descriptive features as; number of views, number of likes, number of comments, video duration, date of uploading and demographic features as; source and uploader were recorded. Main outcome variables The primary outcome variable was content level. Secondary outcome variables were reliability and quality levels measured by DISCERN and Global Quality Scale. Covariates The name and uniform resource locator of the videos were recorded as additional data. Analyses The Mann–Whitney U test was used to compare low-content and high-content videos with a significance level P < 0.05. The Kappa test was used to assess the inter-rater reliability. Results The sample was composed of 50 videos that met study inclusion. The mean total content score for the videos was 2.87 (range: 0–7), with 64% of all videos ( n = 32) classified as low-content. The reliability and quality levels of videos classified as high-content were significantly superior ( p < 0.001). In addition, the video duration was significantly higher in the high-content videos ( p = 0.045). High-content videos were uploaded by healthcare professionals with a ratio of 39%, and the sources of these videos were predominantly oral and maxillofacial surgeons; however, low-content videos were mostly uploaded by clinics (75%), with the sources of these videos predominantly laypersons. Conclusions and Relevance Given the generally low-content, reliability, and quality of online videos regarding facial trauma, clinicians should be cautious in recommending or referring patients to social media platforms.
dentistry, oral surgery & medicine
What problem does this paper attempt to address?