Interventions to improve psychosocial well-being in female BRCA-mutation carriers following risk-reducing surgery.
Lisa Jeffers,Joanne Reid,Donna Fitzsimons,Patrick J Morrison,Martin Dempster
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012894.pub2
IF: 8.4
2019-11-25
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Abstract:Women who carry a pathogenic mutation in either a BRCA1 DNA repair associated or BRCA2 DNA repair associated (BRCA1 or BRCA2) gene have a high lifetime risk of developing breast and tubo‐ovarian cancer. To manage this risk women may choose to undergo risk‐reducing surgery to remove breast tissue, ovaries, and fallopian tubes. Surgery should increase survival, but can impact women's lives adversely at the psychological and psychosexual levels. Interventions to facilitate psychological adjustment and improve quality of life post risk‐reducing surgery are needed. To examine psychosocial interventions in female BRCA carriers who have undergone risk‐reducing surgery and to evaluate the effectiveness of such interventions on psychological adjustment and quality of life. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE and Embase via Ovid, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science up to April 2019 and Scopus up to January 2018. We also handsearched abstracts of scientific meetings and other relevant publications. We included randomised controlled trials (RCT), non‐randomised studies (NRS), prospective and retrospective cohort studies and interventional studies using baseline and postintervention analyses in female BRCA carriers who have undergone risk‐reducing surgery. Two review authors independently assessed eligibility studies for inclusion in the review. We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. We screened 4956 records from the searches, selecting 34 unique studies for full‐text scrutiny, of which two met the inclusion criteria: one RCT and one NRS. The included studies assessed 113 female BRCA carriers who had risk‐reducing surgery, but there was attrition, and outcome data were not available for all participants at final study assessments. We assessed the RCT as at a high risk of bias whilst the NRS did not have a control group. Our GRADE assessment of the studies was very low‐certainty due to the paucity of data and methodological shortcomings of the studies. The primary outcome of quality of life was only measured in the RCT and that was specific to the menopause. Both studies reported on psychological distress and sexual function. Neither study measured body image, perhaps because this is most often associated with risk‐reducing mastectomy rather than oophorectomy. The RCT (66 participants recruited with 48 followed to 12 months) assessed the short‐ and long‐term effects of an eight‐week mindfulness‐based stress reduction (MBSR) training programme on quality of life, sexual functioning, and sexual distress in female BRCA carriers (n = 34) in a specialised family cancer clinic in the Netherlands compared to female BRCA carriers (n = 32) who received usual care. Measurements on the Menopause‐Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) showed some improvement at 3 and 12 months compared to the usual care group. At 3 months the mean MENQOL scores were 3.5 (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.0 to 3.9) and 3.8 (95% CI 3.3 to 4.2) for the MBSR and usual care groups respectively, whilst at 12 months the corresponding values were 3.6 (95% CI 3.1 to 4.0) and 3.9 (95% CI 3.5 to 4.4) (1 study; 48 participants followed up at 12 months). However, these results should be interpreted with caution due to the very low‐certainty of the evidence, where a lower score is better. Other outcome measures on the Female Sexual Function Index and the Female Sexual Distress Scale showed no significant differences between the two groups. Our GRADE assessment of the evidence was very low‐certainty due to the lack of blinding of participants and personnel, attrition bias and self‐selection (as only one‐third of eligible women chose to participate in the study) and serious imprecision due to the small sample size and wide 95% CI. The NRS comprised 37 female BRCA carriers selected from three Boston‐area hospitals who had undergone a novel sexual health intervention following risk‐reducing salpingo‐oophorectomy (RRSO) without a history of tubo‐ovarian cancer. The intervention consisted of targeted sexual‐health education, body awareness and relaxation training, and mindfulness‐based cognitive therapy strategies, followed by two sessions of tailored telephone counselling. This was a single‐arm study without a control group. Our GRADE assessment of the evidence was very low‐certainty, and as there was no comparison group in the included study, we could not estimate a relative effect. The study reported change in psychosexual adjustment from baseline to postintervention (median 2.3 months) using measures of Female Sexual Function Index (n = 34), which yielded change with a mean of 3.91, standard deviation (SD) 9.12, P = 0.018 (1 study, 34 participants; very low‐certainty evidence). The Brief Symptom Inventory, Global Severity Index yielded a mean change of 3.92, SD 5.94, P < 0.001. The Sexual Self‐Efficacy Scale -Abstract Truncated-
medicine, general & internal