Abstract:The article examines the concept of Indo-Pacifica as a functional international political region in the process of formation. Based on the concept of regional construction by I. Neumann, an attempt is made to identify the main actors interested in its creation, the ratio of their interests. States continue to put forward their own interpretations and visions of what Indo-Pacifica should include both in terms of geographical boundaries and in terms of its "ideological" content, norms and rules of conduct within its prospective boundaries. The purpose of the article is to determine the correlation of interests, motivation of the actors involved and to identify groups of approaches, as well as prospects for their implementation. With the help of a discourse analysis of the approaches of different countries, their characteristic features are highlighted, on the basis of which the approaches are divided into two groups - exclusive and inclusive. The evolution of the discourse around Indo-Pacifica is shown, which is connected with the evolution of the concept itself. A change in the position of some of the actors from a neutral/negative attitude to a willingness to support a new concept was revealed. The correlation of cooperation and competition in the "under construction" region is assessed. Internal and external factors of Indo-Pacifica formation are determined. The role of identity is assessed. Politically motivated confrontation and competition of projects is an integral part of regional construction in the Indo-Pacific region. Currently, within its potential borders, there is a struggle between the approaches of various States, which are thus trying to reorient the region to achieve their goals. The practical content, i.e. the nature of the international political processes taking place in the region, will also depend on which vision will eventually become dominant. The world-political significance of the ITR concept for Russia is assessed, as well as its prospects in general.

Central Asian Regionalism or Central Asian Order? Some Reflections

Regionalism and Regional Cooperation in Central Asia

New Regionalism and Norm Creation: A Case of Shanghai Cooperation Organization

Regionalism in the Shadow of Extraregional Great Powers: A Game Theoretical Explanation of Central Asia and Beyond<SUP>?</SUP>

The region that isn't: China, Russia and the failure of regional integration in Central Asia

Central Asia: International Relations As A Factor Of Regional Stability And Integration

Why do Authoritarian Leaders do Regionalism? Ontological Security and Eurasian Regional Cooperation

Southeast Asia and Interregionalism: A Historical Perspective

The International Politics of Water Security in Central Asia

The Central Asian Countries Relations with Russia and China: The Impact of Sensitivities, Dependencies, Threat Perceptions and Regional Organizations

The concept of "Indo-Pacifica" in the context of international region building

The centrality of Central Asia

Central Asia Great Power Competition: A 200-Year History Continues

China Debating the Regional Order

Securing Central Asian Frontiers: Institutionalisation of Borders and Inter-state Relations

Rethinking East Asian Regional Order and China's Rise*

East Asia’s Evolving Regional Order and its Global Implications

THE REGIONAL STRATIFICATION OF POLITICAL SPACE IN THE CONTEXT OF THE USSR’S COLLAPSE. CONCEPTUAL PARADOXES AND CONCEPTUAL DECISIONS

Connectivity and Order: an Analytical Framework

China and Regional Security in South and Southeast Asia: A Comparative Analysis of ASEAN and SAARC

The China Factor in Regional Security Cooperation: The ASEAN Regional Forum and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization