Abstract:Introduction: The use of cemented stems in elderly patients is associated with the risk of intraoperative embolic complications. Uncemented stems eliminate this risk, but their use is controversial because of the risk of mechanical complications, with estimated subsidence between 3.6% and 30% and periprosthetic fractures between 2.1% and 11% at 6 weeks. A retrospective multicenter comparative study was conducted using a propensity score analysis to evaluate mechanical performances of uncemented stems in femoral neck fractures in elderly patients to 1) compare the risk of mechanical complications and 2) assess the use of metaphyseal-anchored stems for this indication. Hypothesis: There is no difference in the risk of mechanical complications, intraoperatively or postoperatively, between these stems. Materials and methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective comparative study including 358 uncemented and 313 cemented stems. The mean age was 84.5 years [83.9–85.1]. The inclusion criteria were patients 70 years and older and a follow-up of at least 6 weeks. The primary endpoint was a composite endpoint comprised of stem subsidence ≥ 2 mm or periprosthetic fracture (up to 3 months postoperatively). The secondary endpoints were infection, stem subsidence ≥ 2 mm, and operative time. These endpoints were analyzed using a propensity score to control confounding factors. A secondary analysis used the same endpoints to compare metaphyseal-anchored (short stems) versus Corail-like stems. Results: After adjusting for the propensity score, we found 11.17% mechanical complications in the uncemented group (n = 40, 5.59% subsidence, and 5.59% fractures) versus 13.42% for the cemented group (n = 42, 7.99% subsidence, and 5.43% fractures). There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 values (Odds Ratio [OR] = 0.64 [95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.14–2.85] [p = 0.7]). The mortality rate due to cement embolism was 1%. There was no difference in the rate of subsidence (OR = 0.55 [95% CI: 0.02–12.5] [p = 0.7]), periprosthetic fracture (OR = 0.65 [95% CI: 0.13–3.12]) [p = 0.7]) or infection (OR = 0.71 [95% CI: 0.32–1.55] [p = 0.4]). However, the operative times were longer in the cemented group (p = 0.03 for hemiarthroplasties (mean additional time 16 minutes) and p = 0.02 for total hip arthroplasties (mean additional time 22 minutes)). No difference was observed between the metaphyseal-anchored (short stems) and Corail-like stems regarding operative time, rate of infection, and rate of stem subsidence or periprosthetic fractures. Discussion: This is one of the first studies to highlight cemented stem subsidence when used for femoral neck fractures in elderly patients. Using uncemented stems in this indication is still warranted, especially since they do not bring about more mechanical complications in the first few months. Metaphyseal-anchored short stems seem to give the same results as "standard" stems. However, these findings need to be assessed in the longer term. Level of Evidence: III; retrospective comparative study

Treatment of femoral neck fractures using actis stem: complication rate in 188 uncemented hemiarthroplasties

Cemented artificial femoral head arthroplasty treats elderly unstable intertrochanteric fracture

Clinical And Biomechanical Studies On Cemented Hemiarthroplasty Treatment Of Advanced-Age Comminuted Intertrochanteric Fractures

Use of Cementless Acetabular Component and Cemented Femoral Component in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Uncemented and cemented hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture with end-stage renal failure

Cemented Vs Cementless Femoral Fixation for Total Hip Arthroplasty After Displaced Femoral Neck Fracture: A Nationwide Analysis of Short-Term Complications and Readmission Rates

Comparative analysis of the quality of the cement mantle in hip hemiarthroplasty after femoral neck fracture between three different surgical approaches: a single-center retrospective observational study

The Biomechanical Study of Intertrochanic Fractures Treated with Cemented Femoral Stem

A Bone-Conserving Revision Stem for Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures of the Geriatric Osteoporotic Population.

Cemented bipolar hemiprosthesis arthoplasty for 16 senile patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures

The use of uncemented stems in femoral neck fractures in elderly patients: A comparative study of 671 cases

Hemiarthroplasty for neck of femur fractures: to cement or not? A systematic review of literature and meta-analysis

Cementless Hemiarthroplasty for a Femoral Neck Fracture in a 93-Year-Old Female Patient: A Case Report

The cemented stem in hip arthroplasty – state of the art technique and recommendations

The Friendly Cemented Stem for Hip Arthroplasty in Aged Patients with Femoral Neck Fracture

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral fracture in the elderly. Cemented or uncemented stem?

Periprosthetic joint infections in femoral neck fracture patients treated with hemiarthroplasty – should we use antibiotic-loaded bone cement?

Artificial Hemiarthroplasty of Femoral Stem Prosthesis in Treatment of Femoral Intertrochanteric Fracture in Elderly Patients

Cemented femoral stem design and postoperative periprosthetic fracture risk following total hip arthroplasty

Cementless calcar-replacement stem with integrated greater trochanter plate for unstable intertrochanteric fracture in very elderly patients

An Alternative to Shoulder Arthroplasty