Abstract:Laparoscopic surgery is now considered by many experts as the approach of choice for the surgical treatment of both benign and malignant colonic diseases. In contrast, robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery is gaining acceptance and use in the colorectal surgery field. Currently, enthusiasm for the robotic platform, as a minimally invasive approach, has gained most interest for cases involving rectal surgery and pelvic anatomy. The robotic technique offers enhanced optics and mechanical instrumentation, which were designed to greatly improve visualization, exposure, and dissection in confined spaces such as the pelvic cavity. Nevertheless, during robotic surgery, attention to adjacent or distant operative field usually requires cumbersome repositioning of the camera and robotic arms. Thus, the robotic platform is best suited for surgical approach in a confined visual field and optimizes optics, fine tissue handling, and intracorporeal suturing technique, whereas laparoscopic surgery may be best suited for wider operative field of view and gross manipulation and dissection, requires smaller and fewer ports, and affords ready adaptation to various surgical maneuvers. In regard to colon resection, robotic surgery results in comparable short-term outcomes as compared with laparoscopy, although with longer operative time and higher expenses. Thus, the routine use of the robotic platform is not currently supported. However, robotic sigmoid colectomy may be beneficial for cases of complex diverticulitis. In addition, robotic sigmoid colectomy may be used in the teaching/training setting as a learning curve procedure before performing more challenging pelvic procedures. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic rectal resection represents the main indication of the use of the robotic platform in colorectal surgery. In this setting, its optical and operative attributes are actualized, whereas the laparoscopic pitfalls are maximally exposed. Although many rectal resections may be successfully accomplished using conventional laparoscopy, it requires extensive surgical expertise. Randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopy with robotic technique for the treatment of rectal cancer are currently being conducted, and it will not be until the results of such studies are available that we can draw solid conclusions regarding the role of robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of rectal cancer. Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted surgeries are safe and viable techniques for the treatment of essentially all colorectal conditions requiring surgical intervention. To determine a suitable minimally invasive surgical approach, it is important to recognize that both laparoscopic and robotic surgeries present benefits and limitations as compared with each other. Hence, the ideal approach should ultimately result in the use of the technique most appropriate for the specific surgical indication, thus realizing the benefits and avoiding the drawbacks of the approach.

Influence of proficiency in conventional laparoscopic surgery in colorectal cancer on the introduction of robotic surgery

Attaining Surgical Competency and Its Implications in Surgical Clinical Trial Design: A Systematic Review of the Learning Curve in Laparoscopic and Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Surgery

Learning Curve of Robotic-Assisted Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer

Learning curve in robotic rectal cancer surgery: current state of affairs

Learning curve for robotic rectal cancer resection at a community-based teaching institution

Prospective analysis of impact of learning curve in robotic-assisted rectal surgery in the high-volume Indian tertiary care centre

Robot-assisted Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Laparoscopic vs robotic inguinal hernia repair: a comparison of learning curves and skill transference in general surgery residents

The impact of robotic surgery for mid and low rectal cancer: a case-matched analysis of a 3-arm comparison--open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery

Comparative Analysis of Learning Curves in Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review

Advantages of robotic surgery for rectal cancer compared to laparoscopic surgery: pelvic anatomy and its impact on urinary dysfunction

Laparoscopic and Robotic Colorectal Surgery: A Comparison and Contrast

Comparison of early surgical outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection reported by a busy district general hospital in England

Adapting to a Robotic Era: The Transferability of Open and Laparoscopic Skills to Robotic Surgery

Learning Curve for Robotic Colorectal Surgery

Learning curve and surgical outcome of robotic assisted colorectal surgery with ERAS program

Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery in obese patients

Oncologic outcomes for robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer: an ACS-NSQIP analysis

Robotic surgery: identifying the learning curve through objective measurement of skill

Perioperative outcomes for single-port robotic versus single-incision laparoscopic surgery: a comparative analysis in colorectal cancer surgery

Experience as a factor influencing the indications for laparoscopic colorectal surgery and the results