Abstract:Laparoscopic surgery is now considered by many experts as the approach of choice for the surgical treatment of both benign and malignant colonic diseases. In contrast, robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery is gaining acceptance and use in the colorectal surgery field. Currently, enthusiasm for the robotic platform, as a minimally invasive approach, has gained most interest for cases involving rectal surgery and pelvic anatomy. The robotic technique offers enhanced optics and mechanical instrumentation, which were designed to greatly improve visualization, exposure, and dissection in confined spaces such as the pelvic cavity. Nevertheless, during robotic surgery, attention to adjacent or distant operative field usually requires cumbersome repositioning of the camera and robotic arms. Thus, the robotic platform is best suited for surgical approach in a confined visual field and optimizes optics, fine tissue handling, and intracorporeal suturing technique, whereas laparoscopic surgery may be best suited for wider operative field of view and gross manipulation and dissection, requires smaller and fewer ports, and affords ready adaptation to various surgical maneuvers. In regard to colon resection, robotic surgery results in comparable short-term outcomes as compared with laparoscopy, although with longer operative time and higher expenses. Thus, the routine use of the robotic platform is not currently supported. However, robotic sigmoid colectomy may be beneficial for cases of complex diverticulitis. In addition, robotic sigmoid colectomy may be used in the teaching/training setting as a learning curve procedure before performing more challenging pelvic procedures. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic rectal resection represents the main indication of the use of the robotic platform in colorectal surgery. In this setting, its optical and operative attributes are actualized, whereas the laparoscopic pitfalls are maximally exposed. Although many rectal resections may be successfully accomplished using conventional laparoscopy, it requires extensive surgical expertise. Randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopy with robotic technique for the treatment of rectal cancer are currently being conducted, and it will not be until the results of such studies are available that we can draw solid conclusions regarding the role of robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of rectal cancer. Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted surgeries are safe and viable techniques for the treatment of essentially all colorectal conditions requiring surgical intervention. To determine a suitable minimally invasive surgical approach, it is important to recognize that both laparoscopic and robotic surgeries present benefits and limitations as compared with each other. Hence, the ideal approach should ultimately result in the use of the technique most appropriate for the specific surgical indication, thus realizing the benefits and avoiding the drawbacks of the approach.

Perioperative outcomes for single-port robotic versus single-incision laparoscopic surgery: a comparative analysis in colorectal cancer surgery

Robot-assisted Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Comparison of early surgical outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection reported by a busy district general hospital in England

Comparison of Non-Oncological Postoperative Outcomes Following Robotic and Laparoscopic Colorectal Resection for Colorectal Malignancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Single-port robotic left colectomy: first clinical experience using the SP robot (rSILS)

Laparoscopic and Robotic Colorectal Surgery: A Comparison and Contrast

Single-incision plus one-port laparoscopy surgery versus conventional multi-port laparoscopy surgery for colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Comparison of outcomes of single incision robotic cholecystectomy and single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Oncologic outcomes for robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer: an ACS-NSQIP analysis

Perioperative and functional outcomes of single-port versus multi-port robotic-assisted radical cystectomy: evidence-based on controlled studies

Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic single-incision cholecystectomy: results of a randomized controlled trial

Robotic single port surgery: Current status and future considerations

Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Surgery in Rectal Cancer Compared with Open and Laparoscopic Surgery

Comparative Effectiveness of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Program Combined With Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery in Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Retrospective Analysis

Surgical and medical outcomes in robotic compared to laparoscopic colectomy global prospective cohort from the American college of surgeons national surgical quality improvement program

Clinical Outcomes of Robotic Surgery Compared to Conventional Surgical Approaches (Laparoscopic or Open)

Comparison of a robotic surgery program for rectal cancer: short- and long-term results from a comparative, retrospective study between two laparoscopic and robotic reference centers

Optimizing outcomes in colorectal surgery: cost and clinical analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic approaches to colon resection

Comparative analysis of the safety and effectiveness of robotic natural orifice specimen extraction versus laparoscopic surgery for colorectal tumors through systematic review and meta-analysis

Early Single-Center Experience of DaVinci® Single-Port (SP) Robotic Surgery in Colorectal Patients

Clinical outcomes of elective robotic vs laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer utilizing a large national database