Impact of sentinel lymph node mapping on survival in patients with high‐risk endometrial cancer in the early stage: A matched cohort study

Eya Jaafar,Victor Gaultier,Henri Wohrer,Juan Pablo Estevez,Clementine Gonthier,Martin Koskas
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.15315
2024-01-18
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Abstract:Objective The aim of this study was to compare patient survival using sentinel lymph node (SLN) procedure and pelvic lymphadenectomy for stating early‐stage high risk endometrial cancer. Methods Patients who underwent surgery for early‐stage high risk endometrial cancer between 2010 and 2017 were extracted from the incidence registry of the SEER program. We identified patients who underwent SLN mapping. Patients who initially underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy were selected as the comparison group. One‐to‐one matching was performed according to age, ethnicity, histology, extension and grade. The primary outcome was disease‐specific survival. The secondary outcome was overall survival. Results A total of 326 patients who underwent SLN mapping and 326 who underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy initially were included in the study. The three‐year analysis did not find a significant difference between the SLN and lymphadenectomy groups on disease‐specific survival probability (88.2% vs 82.7, P = 0.07) and on overall survival probability (82.7% vs 78.2%, P = 0.57). Patients who underwent SLN mapping had a lower mean number of lymph nodes removed (mean 3 vs 16, P
obstetrics & gynecology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?