Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping Versus Systematic Pelvic Lymphadenectomy on the Prognosis for Patients with Intermediate-High-risk Endometrial Cancer Confined to the Uterus Before Surgery: Trial Protocol for a Non-Inferiority Randomized Controlled Trial (SNEC Trial)

Jun Guan,Yu Xue,Rong-yu Zang,Ji-hong Liu,Jian-qing Zhu,Ying Zheng,Bo Wang,Hua-ying Wang,Xiao-jun Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2021.32.e60
2021-01-01
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology
Abstract:BACKGROUND:Sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping has been recommended as an alternative staging approach to lymphadenectomy for apparent uterine-confined endometrial cancer (EC). However, the prognostic value of SLN mapping alone instead of systematic lymphadenectomy on EC patients remains unclear.METHODS:A multi-center, open label, non-inferiority randomized controlled trial has been designed to identify if SLN mapping alone is not inferior to pelvic lymphadenectomy on prognosis of patients with intermediate-high-risk EC clinically confined to uterus. Eligible patients will be 1:1 randomly assigned to accept SLN mapping or pelvic lymphadenectomy. The primary endpoint is the 2-year progression-free survival (PFS). The second points are the 5-year PFS, 5-year overall survival, surgery-related adverse events and life quality. A total of 780 patients will be enrolled from 6 hospitals in China within 3-year period and followed up for 5 years.TRIAL REGISTRATION:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04276532.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?