Chiral recognition and discrimination studies of tyrosine enantiomers on (−)‐18‐crown‐6‐tetracarboxylic acid as a chiral selector by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and docking simulations

Gaeun Lee,Suraj Adhikari,Sunho Lee,Jeong Yeon Lee,Yun‐Cheol Na,Wonjae Lee,Eunjung Bang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/chir.23656
2024-02-28
Chirality
Abstract:Due to the profound biological and clinical implications associated with chiral amino acid tyrosine (Tyr), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and docking simulations were performed for the chiral discrimination and determination of the origin of chiral recognition of Tyr enantiomers on (−)‐(18‐crown‐6)‐2,3,11,12‐tetracarboxylic acid as crown‐ether type chiral selector (CS). Considering the substantial significance of chiral biomolecules, such as amino acids, in our daily routines, we performed chiral recognition and discrimination of tyrosine (Tyr) enantiomers on (−)‐(18‐crown‐6)‐2,3,11,12‐tetracarboxylic acid [(−)‐18‐C‐6‐TA] as crown‐ether type chiral selector (CS) by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and docking simulations. In this study, successful discrimination of the enantiomers of Tyr was achieved, as evidenced by the proton chemical shift differences (ΔΔδ) of Tyr enantiomers observed in the 1H NMR spectra with (−)‐18‐C‐6‐TA CS. We compared the results of these two techniques with the findings obtained from high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) investigations. In both NMR and HPLC experimental and docking simulation studies, a stronger interaction between the L‐Tyr enantiomer with (−)‐18‐C‐6‐TA CS than the D‐Tyr was consistently observed. Also, the binding energy differences (ΔΔEL‐D) found in simulation data that correspond to enantioselectivity aligned well with the NMR experimental result.
chemistry, medicinal, organic,pharmacology & pharmacy, analytical
What problem does this paper attempt to address?