Abstract:One of the critical steps to characterize metabolic alterations in multifactorial diseases, as well as their heterogeneity across different patients, is the identification of reactions that exhibit significantly different usage (or flux) between cohorts. However, since metabolic fluxes cannot be determined directly, researchers typically use constraint-based metabolic network models, customized on post-genomics datasets. The use of random sampling within the feasible region of metabolic networks is becoming more prevalent for comparing these networks. While many algorithms have been proposed and compared for efficiently and uniformly sampling the feasible region of metabolic networks, their impact on the risk of making false discoveries when comparing different samples has not been investigated yet, and no sampling strategy has been so far specifically designed to mitigate the problem. To be able to precisely assess the False Discovery Rate (FDR), in this work we compared different samples obtained from the very same metabolic model. We compared the FDR obtained for different model scales, sample sizes, parameters of the sampling algorithm, and strategies to filter out non-significant variations. To be able to compare the largely used hit-and-run strategy with the much less investigated corner-based strategy, we first assessed the intrinsic capability of current corner-based algorithms and of a newly proposed one to visit all vertices of a constraint-based region. We show that false discoveries can occur at high rates even for large samples of small-scale networks. However, we demonstrate that a statistical test based on the empirical null distribution of Kullback-Leibler divergence can effectively correct for false discoveries. We also show that our proposed corner-based algorithm is more efficient than state-of-the-art alternatives and much less prone to false discoveries than hit-and-run strategies. We report that the differences in the marginal distributions obtained with the two strategies are related to but not fully explained by differences in sample standard deviation, as previously thought. Overall, our study provides insights into the impact of sampling strategies on FDR in metabolic network analysis and offers new guidelines for more robust and reproducible analyses.

Ion entropy and accurate entropy-based FDR estimation in metabolomics

XY-Meta: A High-Efficiency Search Engine for Large-Scale Metabolome Annotation with Accurate FDR Estimation

An algorithm for decoy-free false discovery rate estimation in XL-MS/MS proteomics

Data processing of product ion spectra: Methods to control false discovery rate in compound search results for non-targeted metabolomics

Assessment of false discovery rate control in tandem mass spectrometry analysis using entrapment

An Integrated Workflow of Identification and Quantification on FDR Control-Based Untargeted Metabolome

ProteinInferencer: Confident protein identification and multiple experiment comparison for large scale proteomics projects

Improved False Discovery Rate Estimation Procedure for Shotgun Proteomics

Reinvestigating the Correctness of Decoy-Based False Discovery Rate Control in Proteomics Tandem Mass Spectrometry

Using the entrapment sequence method as a standard to evaluate key steps of proteomics data analysis process

Target-decoy search strategy for increased confidence in large-scale protein identifications by mass spectrometry

NovoBoard: a comprehensive framework for evaluating the false discovery rate and accuracy of de novo peptide sequencing

DIAMetAlyzer allows automated false-discovery rate-controlled analysis for data-independent acquisition in metabolomics

FDR-controlled metabolite annotation for high-resolution imaging mass spectrometry

Introducing 'identification probability' for automated and transferable assessment of metabolite identification confidence in metabolomics and related studies

How to train a post-processor for tandem mass spectrometry proteomics database search while maintaining control of the false discovery rate

Precursor deconvolution error estimation: The missing puzzle piece in false discovery rate in top‐down proteomics

Estimation and inference in metabolomics with non-random missing data and latent factors

Adjusting for false discoveries in constraint-based differential metabolic flux analysis

Metabolite discovery through global annotation of untargeted metabolomics data