Abstract:figure legend Brain stimulation using transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) was paired with either posterior epidural spinal cord stimulation (SCS; top) or anterior SCS (bottom). Middle: tES with posterior SCS produced a large facilitation over the tES‐only response; no such facilitation was observed with anterior SCS. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) shown for individual participant examples of brain‐only (light) and pairing motor evoked potentials (dark). Right: facilitation with posterior SCS was highly dependent on the interstimulus interval; optimal timing occurred when tES and SCS converged in the cervical spinal cord. Volitional movement requires descending input from the motor cortex and sensory feedback through the spinal cord. We previously developed a paired brain and spinal electrical stimulation approach in rats that relies on convergence of the descending motor and spinal sensory stimuli in the cervical cord. This approach strengthened sensorimotor circuits and improved volitional movement through associative plasticity. In humans, it is not known whether posterior epidural spinal cord stimulation targeted at the sensorimotor interface or anterior epidural spinal cord stimulation targeted within the motor system is effective at facilitating brain evoked responses. In 59 individuals undergoing elective cervical spine decompression surgery, the motor cortex was stimulated with scalp electrodes and the spinal cord was stimulated with epidural electrodes, with muscle responses being recorded in arm and leg muscles. Spinal electrodes were placed either posteriorly or anteriorly, and the interval between cortex and spinal cord stimulation was varied. Pairing stimulation between the motor cortex and spinal sensory (posterior) but not spinal motor (anterior) stimulation produced motor evoked potentials that were over five times larger than brain stimulation alone. This strong augmentation occurred only when descending motor and spinal afferent stimuli were timed to converge in the spinal cord. Paired stimulation also increased the selectivity of muscle responses relative to unpaired brain or spinal cord stimulation. Finally, clinical signs suggest that facilitation was observed in both injured and uninjured segments of the spinal cord. The large effect size of this paired stimulation makes it a promising candidate for therapeutic neuromodulation. Key points Pairs of stimuli designed to alter nervous system function typically target the motor system, or one targets the sensory system and the other targets the motor system for convergence in cortex. In humans undergoing clinically indicated surgery, we tested paired brain and spinal cord stimulation that we developed in rats aiming to target sensorimotor convergence in the cervical cord. Arm and hand muscle responses to paired sensorimotor stimulation were more than five times larger than brain or spinal cord stimulation alone when applied to the posterior but not anterior spinal cord. Arm and hand muscle responses to paired stimulation were more selective for targeted muscles than the brain‐ or spinal‐only conditions, especially at latencies that produced the strongest effects of paired stimulation. Measures of clinical evidence of compression were only weakly related to the paired stimulation effect, suggesting that it could be applied as therapy in people affected by disorders of the central nervous system.

Does Post-Tetanic Transcranial Stimulation Augment the Wave Amplitudes of Spinal Cord Evoked Potential (Tc-SCEP)?

Combined neuromuscular electrical stimulation and transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation increases motor cortical plasticity in healthy humans

The Immediate and Short-Term Effects of Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation and Peripheral Nerve Stimulation on Corticospinal Excitability

Modulations in neural pathways excitability post transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation among individuals with spinal cord injury: a systematic review

Transspinal Direct Current Electrical Stimulation Selectively Affects the Excitability of the Corticospinal System, Depending on the Intensity but Not Motor Skills

Transcranial magnetic stimulation induced early silent period and rebound activity re-examined

Effects of Tetanic Stimulation of Peripheral Nerve on Intracranial Direct Electrical Stimulation Motor-Evoked Potentials in Patients Undergoing Cerebral Functional Area Operation

Transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation increases corticospinal transmission and enhances voluntary motor output in humans

Assessment of corticospinal excitability after traumatic spinal cord injury using MEP recruitment curves: a preliminary TMS study

Effects of cervical transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation on spinal excitability

Voluntary Modulation of Evoked Responses Generated by Epidural and Transcutaneous Spinal Stimulation in Humans with Spinal Cord Injury

The Clinical Application of MEP Elicited by Short Train Transcranial Electrical Stimulation

Timing‐dependent synergies between motor cortex and posterior spinal stimulation in humans

Motor Point Stimulation in Spinal Paired Associative Stimulation can Facilitate Spinal Cord Excitability

Transcranial magnetic stimulation intensity affects exercise-induced changes in corticomotoneuronal excitability and inhibition and voluntary activation

EEG Monitoring Is Feasible and Reliable during Simultaneous Transcutaneous Electrical Spinal Cord Stimulation

Targeted transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation promotes persistent recovery of upper limb strength and tactile sensation in spinal cord injury: a pilot study

5 kHz Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation: Lack of Cortical Excitability Changes When Grouped in a Theta Burst Pattern

Skin and not dorsal root stimulation reduces hypertonus in thoracic motor complete spinal cord injury: a single case report.

The effect of intermittent theta burst stimulation on corticomotor excitability of the biceps brachii in nonimpaired individuals

Cortical oscillatory activity and the induction of plasticity in the human motor cortex