Abstract:Modeling and understanding dendrite growth on lithium metal anodes during charging is vital for improving battery safety. The phase field method has become an increasingly popular tool to achieve this due to its flexibility in handling complex morphologies and coupled physical processes. However, quantitative phase field models under realistic electrochemical conditions are rare. In this work, we derive a thermodynamically consistent phase field model in the grand potential framework. The design of this model emphasizes quantitative modeling of electrodeposition with experimental loading conditions and realistic length and time scales. First, electrostatic potentials in both the electrode and the electrolyte are considered to account for the interfacial potential difference. Second, the electrochemical driving force can be large even with an applied voltage of a few hundred millivolts; therefore, the grid size usually must be as small as a few nanometers to maintain a stable phase field profile. This hinders the modeling of system sizes of practical interest. To solve this problem, a mapping approach is introduced to maintain stability with moderate grid sizes and realistic applied voltages. Third, we thoroughly compare the phase field model with results from a sharp interface model for various cases that permit analytical solutions. Numerical studies demonstrate that the proposed model can quantitatively reproduce the sharp interface results. Moreover, lithium has highly anisotropic interfacial energy, which leads to corners on the equilibrium electrode-electrolyte interface shape. A convexification method is used to remove the ill-posedness due to this strong anisotropy. Finally, a parallel solver is developed to handle large systems. The overall framework is demonstrated by studying lithium dendrite morphologies under various conditions. In future work, the model can be used as a computational tool for the high-throughput screening process in battery design.

Chemo-mechanical coupling phase-field modeling of lithium dendrite growth within solid electrolyte

Chemo-mechanical coupling phase-field modeling of lithium dendrite growth within solid electrolyte

Simulations of dendrite and crack and their interactions in solid electrolyte by phase field method

A Three-Dimensional Multiphysics Field Coupled Phase Field Model for Lithium Dendrite Growth

Mechanical stress-thermodynamic phase-field simulation of lithium dendrite growth in solid electrolyte battery

The Influence of Stress-Dependent Overpotential on Dendrite Growth in All-Solid-state Battery with Cracks

Phase-Field Modeling of Dendrite Growth in Lithium Electrodeposition Process in Lithium Metal Batteries

Coupled crack propagation and dendrite growth in solid electrolyte of all-solid-state battery

An Electrochemical-Mechanical Phase Field Model for Lithium Dendrite

Unlocking the Electrochemical–Mechanical Coupling Behaviors of Dendrite Growth and Crack Propagation in All‐Solid‐State Batteries

A Multiphysics Understanding of Lithium Dendrite Growth Mechanism and Mitigation Strategy in All-Solid-State Batteries

Mechano-electrochemical Modeling of Lithium Dendrite Penetration in a Solid-State Electrolyte: Mechanism and Suppression

Quantitative Phase Field Modeling of Li Dendrite Growth

Three-dimensional experimental-scale phase-field modeling of dendrite formation in rechargeable lithium-metal batteries

Understanding and Predicting the Lithium Dendrite Formation in Li-Ion Batteries: Phase Field Model

Atomic mechanism of lithium dendrite penetration in solid electrolytes

Phase field modeling of dendrite growth mechanism of Mg and Li in electrodeposition

Nonlinear Phase-Field Modeling of Lithium Dendritic Growth during Electrodeposition

Integrating First-Principle Calculation and Phase-Field Simulation for Lithium Dendritic Growth on the Anode of a Lithium-Ion Battery

Phase-field simulation tending to depict practical electrodeposition process in lithium-based batteries

Enabling dendrite-free charging for lithium batteries based on transport-reaction competition mechanism in CHAIN framework