Abstract:Hypothesis and Background It is known that, though widely used, shoulder range of motion (ROM) measurements are not standardized and have a high rate of intra- and interobserver differences. Particularly, the inconsistency in quantitative and qualitative measurements and their relationship to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) make shoulder health difficult to determine. Methods This was a prospective study of 147 patients who presented with a chief complaint of shoulder pain to the orthopedic sports medicine and shoulder clinic of a single fellowship-trained surgeon. Measured by one examiner, quantitative ROM measurements were taken with a goniometer and qualitative ROM measured by the anatomic level that the patient could reach. The following PROMs were used as well: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score (ASES), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (DASH), 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System pain interference short form 6a (PROMIS 6a). Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS using Pearson correlation and two-sample t- test. Benjamini-Hochberg correction was used to determine p-value at which statistical significance was reached to correct for multiple comparisons. Results Qualitative internal rotation (IR), (the hand behind back reach test) and qualitative forward flexion (FF) correlated with all goniometer angle measurements and PROMs (both shoulder and general health scores). These qualitative measures proved to be an appropriate proxy for IR and FF goniometer measurements. Qualitative external rotation (ER) was not a good substitute for quantitative ER measurement. Quantitative ER correlated with all PROMs. As ROM increased when measured by quantitative ER, qualitative IR, and qualitative FF, shoulder and general health PROMs incrementally increased as well. Discussion/Conclusion Qualitative IR measurement, the hand-behind-back reach test, is an adequate substitution for IR goniometer angle as well as a strong representation of global shoulder ROM, shoulder health, and general health while factoring in patient age. Qualitative FF measurement is also an appropriate proxy for quantitative FF and represents global shoulder and general health without factoring in age. Quantitative ER via goniometer angle, is a better assessment of the shoulder than qualitative ER and is a representation of overall shoulder and general health. We recommend the use of quantitative ER, qualitative IR, and qualitative FF measurements to best understand a patient's overall shoulder health and its impact on their overall health.

Correlation Between Patient-Reported and Clinician-Measured Shoulder Range of Motion in Patients Undergoing Shoulder Surgery

Reliability of patient self-assessment of shoulder range of motion and strength after shoulder arthroplasty

Understanding Overall Shoulder Function and Health: The Value of Specific Quantitative Versus Qualitative Shoulder Range of Motion on Patient-Reported Outcome Measures

Reaching Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Substantial Clinical Benefit, and Patient-Acceptable Symptomatic State for Patient-Reported Outcome Measures following Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Does Not Correlate with Patient Satisfaction

How do digital range of motion measurement devices 'measure-up' to traditional goniometry in assessing shoulder range of motion? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Accuracy of a Smartphone Software Application Compared With a Handheld Goniometer for Measuring Shoulder Range of Motion in Asymptomatic Adults

Predictors of Postoperative Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Response Rates Among Patients With Rotator Cuff Repair

Outcome Reporting in Randomized Trials for Shoulder Disorders: Literature Review to Inform the Development of a Core Outcome Set

Self-Reported Outcomes in Early Postoperative Management After Shoulder Surgery Using a Home-Based Strengthening and Stabilization System With Telehealth

Internal Rotation Measurements: Correlation between Vertebral Body Level and Goniometer Measurements on Functional Outcome Scores

Preoperative Planning for Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: Does the Clinical Range of Motion Match the Planned 3D Humeral Displacement?

Comparative Analysis of Photograph-Based Clinical Goniometry to Standard Techniques

Surgical Parameters During Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Predict Post-Surgical Kinematics During the Hand-to-Head Motion

ASES and UCLA Are Responsive Patient-Reported Outcome Measures After Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Association of Preoperative Shoulder Osteoarthritis Severity Score With Change in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score at 2 Years After Rotator Cuff Repair

Validation of the shoulder range of motion software for measurement of shoulder ranges of motion in consultation: coupling a red/green/blue-depth video camera to artificial intelligence

The Real Post-Operative Range of Motion Differs from the Virtual Pre-Operative Planned Range of Motion in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty

Variability of MCID, SCB, and PASS Thresholds in Studies Assessing Patient-Reported Outcomes After Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review

Determinants of Patient-Rated Benefit 6 Months Post Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: An Analysis of 2010 Patients

An Analysis of the Structures People With Shoulder Pain Recall After Receiving Their Diagnostic Imaging Results

Comparison of Patients' and Surgeons' Expectations before Shoulder Arthroplasty