In simple but challenging search tasks, most errors are stochastic

Jeremy M. Wolfe,Johan Hulleman,Ava Mitra,Wentao Si

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-024-02938-y

2024-08-23

Attention Perception & Psychophysics

Abstract:In visual search tasks in the lab and in the real world, people routinely miss targets that are clearly visible: so-called look but fail to see (LBFTS) errors. If search displays are shown to the same observer twice, we can ask about the probability of joint errors, where the target is missed both times. If errors are "deterministic," then the probability of a second error on the same display–given that the target was missed the first time–should be high. If errors are "stochastic," the probability of joint errors should be the product of the error rate for first and second appearances. Here, we report on two versions of a T among L s search with somewhat degraded letters to make search more difficult. In Experiment 1, T s could either appear amidst crowded "clumps" of L s or more in isolation. Observers made more errors when the T was in a clump, but these errors were mainly stochastic. In Experiment 2, the task was made harder by making T s and L s more similar. Again, errors were predominantly stochastic. If other, socially important errors are also stochastic, this would suggest that "double reading," where two observers (human or otherwise) look at each stimulus, could reduce overall error rates.

psychology, experimental