Abstract:Many important situations require human observers to simultaneously search for more than one object. Despite a long history of research into visual search, the behavioral and neural mechanisms associated with multiple-target search are poorly understood. Here we test the novel theory that the efficiency of looking for multiple targets critically depends on the mode of cognitive control the environment affords to the observer. We used an innovative combination of electroencephalogram (EEG) and eye tracking while participants searched for two targets, within two different contexts: either both targets were present in the search display and observers were free to prioritize either one of them, thus enabling proactive control over selection; or only one of the two targets would be present in each search display, which requires reactive control to reconfigure selection when the wrong target has been prioritized. During proactive control, both univariate and multivariate signals of beta-band (15-35 Hz) power suppression before display onset predicted switches between target selections. This signal originated over midfrontal and sensorimotor regions and has previously been associated with endogenous state changes. In contrast, imposed target selections requiring reactive control elicited prefrontal power enhancements in the delta/theta band (2-8 Hz), but only after display onset. This signal predicted individual differences in associated oculomotor switch costs, reflecting reactive reconfiguration of target selection. The results provide compelling evidence that multiple target representations are differentially prioritized during visual search, and for the first time reveal distinct neural mechanisms underlying proactive and reactive control over multiple-target search.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Searching for more than one object in complex visual scenes can be detrimental for search performance. Although perhaps annoying in daily life, this can have severe consequences in professional settings such as medical and security screening. Previous research has not yet resolved whether multiple-target search involves changing priorities in what people attend to, and how such changes are controlled. We approached these questions by concurrently measuring cortical activity and eye movements using EEG and eye tracking while observers searched for multiple possible targets. Our findings provide the first unequivocal support for the existence of two modes of control during multiple-target search, which are expressed in qualitatively distinct time-frequency signatures of the EEG both before and after visual selection.

Validating The Random Search Model For Two Targets Of Different Difficulty

Visual search time in detection tasks with multiple targets: Considering change of the effective stimulus field area

Study on visual search strategy for three-target search task

Effects of Location-based and Object-based Selective Attention in Visual Target Detection Tasks

Measuring The Performance Of A Triple-Target Visual Search Task

Visual Search May Not Require Target Representation in Working Memory or Long-Term Memory.

A Study of Targets Independence and Modeling of Multiple-Target Random Visual Search

Trade-off between search costs and accuracy in oculomotor and manual search tasks

Errors in visual search: Are they stochastic or deterministic?

Skills and cautiousness predict performance in difficult search

The reconfiguration of task set has no effect on the efficiency of feature search

Effects of Target Prevalence, Target Presence and Time Pressure on Visual Search Performance

Reward Delays Quitting in Visual Search.

Blind Search -- Successful Saccades to the Unknown Target Location Up to 1000 Ms after Removal of Visual Search Stimulus

Group efficiency based on the termination rule in the multiple-targets visual search task

In simple but challenging search tasks, most errors are stochastic

Multiple visual items can be simultaneously compared with target templates in memory

Display Movement Velocity and Dynamic Visual Search Performance

Target-distractor similarity predicts visual search efficiency but only for highly similar features

A Study on Visual Search and Selection of Pull-down Menu

Beta and Theta Oscillations Differentially Support Free Versus Forced Control over Multiple-Target Search